Where does the buck stop with liberals?
There wasn’t pictures of Bernell Trammell with a Trump sign?
Do you have a picture of Kushner not executing The Plan for political reasons?
Come on now…
LucyLou: WuWei: LucyLou: party-free: WuWei:One Vanity Fair article claiming causation. Not very scientific.
There was less evidence to support the theory that Bernell Trammell was killed over his support of Trump than @NebraskaFootball provided in his OP to back his suggestion regarding this topic, but that didn’t stop people from jumping to the conclusion that Trammell was murdered over politics.
Consistency.
Very good point.
It would be if it was correct. It’s not.
How do you get that? There was literally no backup documentation in that other thread. Just speculation. C’mon now.
There wasn’t pictures of Bernell Trammell with a Trump sign?
Do you have a picture of Kushner not executing The Plan for political reasons?
Come on now…
There are also pictures of him with Black Lives Matters, Democrat Lena Taylor for Mayor, and Pride signs.
There are also pictures of him with Black Lives Matters, Democrat Lena Taylor for Mayor, and Pride signs.
Yes there are. And what is the difference? What is unusual? Consistency.
Here you guys have made me the topic. My apologies.
Back on topic we go.
Jared Kushner is a horrible, evil person who let 150,000 people die to win an election.
LucyLou:There are also pictures of him with Black Lives Matters, Democrat Lena Taylor for Mayor, and Pride signs.
Yes there are. And what is the difference? What is unusual? Consistency.
There is also the big jump to the speculation that he was killed for signs at all. To me, that’s the dumbest part.
WuWei: LucyLou:There are also pictures of him with Black Lives Matters, Democrat Lena Taylor for Mayor, and Pride signs.
Yes there are. And what is the difference? What is unusual? Consistency.
There is also the big jump to the speculation that he was killed for signs at all? To me, that’s the dumbest part.
Ok, that’s fine. An opinion I don’t share. Let’s get back on topic please.
Jared Kushner is a horrible, evil person who let 150,000 people die to win an election.
Right. Because if Hillary was elected we would have no Covid deaths. But we can fix that by electing Joe.
WuWei:Jared Kushner is a horrible, evil person who let 150,000 people die to win an election.
Right. Because if Hillary was elected we would have no Covid deaths. But we can fix that by electing Joe.
Hilldawg is not the topic, let’s get back on topic please.
Jared Kushner is a horrible, evil person
I agree for the most part.
who let 150,000 people die to win an election.
Not all of them, no. Many tens of thousands needlessly though? A distinct possibility.
And the decision was not his regardless. The decision was Trump’s as the Chief Executive.
WuWei:Jared Kushner is a horrible, evil person
I agree for the most part.
WuWei:who let 150,000 people die to win an election.
Not all of them, no. Many tens of thousands needlessly though? A distinct possibility.
And the decision was not his regardless. The decision was Trump’s as the Chief Executive.
Thank you for the correction.
if hillary were elected epstiens partners would have tragically committed suicide by now
wonderingrover:I can’t express my true thoughts about the current administration in light of this information without breaking the TOS, so I’ll just say Trump HAS to go as a result of this information. The blood of 150,000+ American citizens is on his hands. I will vote for Biden in November. The lives of Americans are riding on this.
This was the straw? Vanity Fair?
What are your thoughts on the contents in the article?
What are your thoughts on the contents in the article?
Gossip. Sloppy. No scientific method.
I agree with it being sloppy. It seems well researched, however.
WuWei:You seem to be 100% sure that’s what happened. Based on one Vanity Fair article?
Let’s hypothesize other reasons it might have happened that make sense.
This seems on paper to be a well thought out plan. What they actually decided to do was a piece of ■■■■■
What would have made them think the “punt testing to the states” would have worked better?
I agree with it being sloppy. It seems well researched, however.
well researched? talking to one person who claims to have been on the team and comes up with some wild ass accusation that only a cult of trump hating extremists could possibly think is true? okay. This one ranks right up there with pizza gate and the russia hoax. I’ll believe it when you can show it wasn’t cooked up by the same guy at the brookings institute.
WuWei:You seem to be 100% sure that’s what happened. Based on one Vanity Fair article?
Let’s hypothesize other reasons it might have happened that make sense.
This seems on paper to be a well thought out plan. What they actually decided to do was a piece of ■■■■■
What would have made them think the “punt testing to the states” would have worked better?
Logistics
Legalities
Lack of support
If the article was correct, why would they not do it now?
I agree with it being sloppy. It seems well researched, however.
Based on what?