It is one big country. That is a fact. We are United and not 50 separate entities.
We have a common bond.
Allan
It is one big country. That is a fact. We are United and not 50 separate entities.
We have a common bond.
Allan
I see this way of looking at it as part of the problem.
We do have a common bond, but so what?
What is it?
The federal govt exists to SUPPORT the states. Not rule over them. Do you see any areas in the crisis where the federal govt did not support New York? Did they sent the mercy ship there? Did they send meals and PPE?
The Federal Govt should not be running the states. That is the states job. They should have a support roll.
We are Americans and use the same language, monetary system, military etc etc
One can see a doctor that does not take new Medicare patients. Iâll give you an example. My late mother was once denied treatment by a cardiologist who declined to take on new medicare patients. When I offered to pay out of my pocket for her treatment, his staff told me that was impossible unless she opted out of Medicare because the government considers that fraud.
Think about that for a minute. I offer to pay cash for the doctorâs services thereby alleviating the burden of payment from the taxpayer/Medicare system, and also alleviating the doctorâs office of the burden of dealing with the bureaucracy to get paid, and the government considers that fraud.
This is why libertarians like myself are so resistant to further socialization of healthcare. Health care is already way too screwed up by government as is.
We absolutely are 50 separate entities. Only the federal government binds them. But that doesnât make them one as far as my life is concerned. There are separate conditions and laws in every state. If it was one big country then I wouldnât talk about leaving NJ when I retire in a couple of years. Iâd stay because it isnât any different in North Carolina or Florida. But itâs quite different.
We donât actually use the military, but I get your point.
I donât know that I agree about the language.
We absolutely are 50 separate entities. Only the federal government binds them. But that doesnât make them one as far as my life is concerned. There are separate conditions and laws in every state. If it was one big country then I wouldnât talk about leaving NJ when I retire in a couple of years. Iâd stay because it isnât any different in North Carolina or Florida. But itâs quite different
There are differences of course. But the constitution unites us together.
There are things the states control. There are things the constitution controls.
Texas canât ban same sex marriages because of the equal protection clause of the constitution.
But Texas can ban casino gambling.
So your 50 separate entities is flawed.
Itâs a unique situation in modern times.
There is no other country like it in the world.
Allan
We donât actually use the military, but I get your point.
I donât know that I agree about the language
When I go to California, Kentucky, New York. Places I go to often, I understand what people are saying and can read the signs that are posted. We have an interstate highway system. And my 20 dollar bill is accepted everywhere.
Allan
It is one big country. That is a fact. We are United and not 50 separate entities.
We have a common bond.
While you are correct in stating the U.S. is one big country, you ignore the fact that there are 50 states, each with its own Constitution and Government independent of the Federal Government. The âcommon bondâ is a very generic ideal, and that is âLife, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happinessâ which is spelled out in the Declaration of Independence.
While you are correct in stating the U.S. is one big country, you ignore the fact that there are 50 states, each with its own Constitution and Government independent of the Federal Government. The âcommon bondâ is a very generic ideal, and that is âLife, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happinessâ which is spelled out in the Declaration of Independence.
Independent of the federal govt. lol.
Thatâs a funny one.
All laws in states have to be constitutional.
Thatâs not independence.
Thatâs dependence.
Depends on what the constitution says.
Allan
I knew you wouldnât understand. Carry on.
Mainly because the federal government has assumed many powers that was never meant for it to have.
Donât forget about us please.
Ah yes. Thank you.
While I agree with a lot of the points youâve made - and agree that the Constitution can be looked at as a âcontractâ in a metaphorical sense - it is not a contract as defined by Contract law.
As for my personal views on the âsocial contractâ - I donât necessarily reject it - but nor do I consider myself to be bound to it.
Ah yes. Thank you.
While I agree with a lot of the points youâve made - and agree that the Constitution can be looked at as a âcontractâ in a metaphorical sense - it is not a contract as defined by Contract law.
As for my personal views on the âsocial contractâ - I donât necessarily reject it - but nor do I consider myself to be bound to it.
I disagree with your assessment of contract in contract law.
Not bound to it? Balderdash.
Oh and, thatâs it?
I disagree with your assessment of contract in contract law.
Ok. That doesnât change the fact that legally, its not a contract. A contract is an agreement between parties that the law will enforce.
There is no mechanism to legally enforce the Constitution on me.
Not bound to it? Balderdash.
Thatâs the wrong word. Iâll try to think of a better one.
Oh and, thatâs it?
I have no doubt Iâll think of things to add. Itâs not like Iâve kept this conversation foremost in mt mind for the last 2 days.