How do you feel about Contract Law?
When I was a kid, I lost a weeks pay check betting on three card monty. I was really mad that the dealer cheated me (in my view), but was more angry at myself for placing the bet to begin with. But looking back at the bet, it was a contract. If I found the correct card, dealer would pay me. If I picked the wrong card, I would pay him. It was in simple terms, an oral contract.
So now I rent a car and engage in a contract. I agree to pay so much money, they agree to let me use their car. Contract Law.
I rent out a house I own. They pay me rent, I agree to let them live in my house. If they suddenly decide they dont want to pay me what we agreed to, they shouldnt be able to run to a judge and get him to change the price.
What happens if I sign a contract with you, and after signing the contract, I decide I dont like it. So I go to a judge and try to get this judge to redefine the contract. If the judge does redefine the contract, that is not fair to you. If I didnt like the contract, I should of sought to change the contract before I signed it.
I see our Constitution as a contract between the govt and its citizens. If the citizens dont like the contract, their is a built in way to change it. The citizenry gets 2/3s of the congress to agree. Then it goes to the states to ratify it. 3/4s of the states have to ratify it and then the constitution is changed.
Over the last few years, it seems people dont like the contract, and rather than change it, they just want to go the easy route to change it by judicial decree rather than doing the work required to change it.
If you think people should get healthcare as a citizen or even an illegal, than change the contract. Put up a constitutional amendment and let the chips fall where they may.
Instead, there are many people that will just run to the judges. Judges should only rule on what the constitution says, and how a law aligns up with it. It is garbage that the congress would attempt to make a religious order pay for birth control or abortion inducing drugs. That was not part of our contract. If one thinks it should be, change the contract. It is garbage that state governors attempt to prevent the freedom of assembly. That is against the contract. Telling citizens that they have to purchase a product from a company that they do not want to engage with is garbage. That is against the contract.
The losing side in the contract dispute usually gets angry. I really believe Trump was elected because Americans were sick and tired of this type of behavior. It looks to me like he will be re-elected because this same tactic continues to be used rather than be upfront about it and change the contract the way it was designed to be changed.
I’m glad Amy Coney Barrett will be confirmed. All 9 justices should look at the law the same way she does. Chief Justice Roberts redefining a penalty as a tax is garbage.
I dont want to see my fellow citizens suffer over pre-existing conditions. The Congress is in position to help them. They should act to help them. They shouldnt attempt to change the constitution by redefining terms, or judge shopping.
Our constitution is a contract between the govt and the citizenry. It should be treated as such, and changed where necessary in accordance with the correct procedures.