No it doesn’t.
Not unless 100% of the additional registered voters voted Democratic … which we know is not true because Trump got more than 11 million more votes in 2020 than he did in 2016.
No it doesn’t.
Not unless 100% of the additional registered voters voted Democratic … which we know is not true because Trump got more than 11 million more votes in 2020 than he did in 2016.
Paul_Thomson:However crushed Trump allegedly becomes in 2024, any other GOP candidate would be crushed even worse by the socialist activist machine. Whether he will be crushed is a leftist fever dream at this point.
I disagree. Trump is widely hated and voter turnout will be robust to take him down again. The GOP’s best bet is to nominate someone like Tim Scott and hope for moderate to low turnout.
The obvious contradiction is that yes, Trump is much hated, but Biden is not much loved. Yet he pulled 15 million more votes than beloved (by libs) Obama. To a reasonable, unbiased thinker, that does not compute.
I would rather elect the honest people than the crooks. There are very few left in democrat party that are not crooks.
I know you’d hate to admit it, but Trump lost fair and square. He didn’t even win the popular vote in 2016.
Not unless 100% of the additional registered voters voted Democratic … which we know is not true because Trump got more than 11 million more votes in 2020 than he did in 2016.
2020 had the highest voter turnout rate in US history (thanks, Trump!). 168 million registered voters, 155 million people voted. The rest is just partisan narrative.
The obvious contradiction is that yes, Trump is much hated, but Biden is not much loved. Yet he pulled 15 million more votes than beloved (by libs) Obama. To a reasonable, unbiased thinker, that does not compute.
It feels like you’re arguing that the 2020 election was fraudulent and stolen. Is that right?
Samm:Not unless 100% of the additional registered voters voted Democratic … which we know is not true because Trump got more than 11 million more votes in 2020 than he did in 2016.
2020 had the highest voter turnout rate in US history (thanks, Trump!). 168 million registered voters, 155 million people voted. The rest is just partisan narrative.
Samm:The obvious contradiction is that yes, Trump is much hated, but Biden is not much loved. Yet he pulled 15 million more votes than beloved (by libs) Obama. To a reasonable, unbiased thinker, that does not compute.
It feels like you’re arguing that the 2020 election was fraudulent and stolen. Is that right?
You can try to spin it however you like, but the fact is, the numbers don’t add up. That’s the only thing I am arguing.
You can try to spin it however you like, but the fact is, the numbers don’t add up. That’s the only thing I am arguing.
The argument you’re making is one I’ve heard many times. You can’t believe that so many people would vote for Biden. How could that many people be so wrong!? It’s emotion, don’t pretend it’s math.
They add up just fine.
136 M people voted in 2016.
159 M people voted in 2020.
About 3 M fewer people voted for third party in 2020 than did so in 2016.
And that’s how Biden scored 16 M more votes than Hillary and Trump scored 10 M more than he did in 2016.
Numbers add up just fine.
Samm:You can try to spin it however you like, but the fact is, the numbers don’t add up. That’s the only thing I am arguing.
The argument you’re making is one I’ve heard many times. You can’t believe that so many people would vote for Biden. How could that many people be so wrong!? It’s emotion, don’t pretend it’s math.
Then don’t dismiss the math, it’s completely without emotion.
I remember the hate that was flung at Reagan and the lies. Bush as well. And no the GOP don’t fight as dirty as the left. They cry about obama and he was protected by everyone. Just the fact that he ordered the killing of a US citizen without a trial proves the the left get handled by kid gloves by the majority of the media. I can’t remember member of the GOP calling for a president to be killed.
What are you muttering about. TDS. You really need to get help with that. Fact is you won’t find one post of mine caring one way or another. You will find posts of mine saying there was a fair amount of cheating. But keep supporting a pervert.
One aspect of this whole sordid episode I find rather telling is that the lib mantra right after the election was “There is no evidence that fraud was committed.”
More recently that has evolved into “There is no evidence that there was sufficient fraud to change the outcome of the election.”
One aspect of this whole sordid episode I find rather telling is that the lib mantra right after the election was “There is no evidence that fraud was committed.”
More recently that has evolved into “There is no evidence that there was sufficient fraud to change the outcome of the election.”
No it was always “not sufficient to change the outcome”.
There is no way to declare any system 100% foolproof.
That’s a far cry from saying we can know there wasn’t enough fraud to change many 5-6 figure number of votes.
And again, you’re wrong about the math.
Math is unemotional, but PEOPLE can be emotional about math.
The only cheating that was definitely found to be cheating were Trump supporters trying to vote more than once.
Seriously.
the lib mantra right after the election was “There is no evidence that fraud was committed.”
That was also Trump-appointed Attorney General Bill Barr’s mantra.
The Dems won’t allow Kennedy to win the primary. AG Merrick Garland won’t even give him security while he campaigns.
We don’t want him. Steve Bannon does though. Let him run against Trump.
I will only vote for Biden if he and Trump are the only two options
By that reasoning you would then stand in front of an out of control bus in stead of trying to jump out of the way…
Samm:One aspect of this whole sordid episode I find rather telling is that the lib mantra right after the election was “There is no evidence that fraud was committed.”
More recently that has evolved into “There is no evidence that there was sufficient fraud to change the outcome of the election.”
No it was always “not sufficient to change the outcome”.
There is no way to declare any system 100% foolproof.
That’s a far cry from saying we can know there wasn’t enough fraud to change many 5-6 figure number of votes.
And again, you’re wrong about the math.
Math is unemotional, but PEOPLE can be emotional about math.
“The Times Called Officials in Every State: No Evidence of Voter Fraud”
The president and his allies have baselessly claimed that rampant voter fraud stole victory from him. Officials contacted by The Times said that there were no irregularities that affected the outcome.
Samm:the lib mantra right after the election was “There is no evidence that fraud was committed.”
That was also Trump-appointed Attorney General Bill Barr’s mantra.
And? What does Barr say now?
That there is no evidence fraud was committed.
Well you seem to be forgetting twitter, facebook and the DOJ banning conservative voices on social media.