A Chicago teacher was removed for supporting law enforcement. The party who has suddenly discovered “free speech” for church crashers, sends the mob to silence anyone with a different point of view. Yes libs, this is a key element of fascism. So where is the teacher’s union? They know 100 precent that he has not violated any policy. He needs to lawyer up. When government stops you from exercising your first amendment rights, it’s a violation of the 1st amendment. He needs to lawyer up and sue everyone involved including the union who he paid dues to, to protect him from tyrants. Nothing in the code of conduct says teachers cannot support law enforcement. SUE-THEIR-ASSES-OFF.
3 Likes
If only he had dismissed his class to go protest without informing parents we wouldn’t be here in this position.
2 Likes
From your link:
“The teacher used his First Amendment rights to make a statement,” Bovey said. “Others used their First Amendment rights in commenting on the situation. The school board took appropriate action to go through the due process of investigating a situation which had adversely impacted the education of children. The public used their First Amendment rights to comment (in favor and against) the actions of the school board and then the teacher made a decision to resign. At the end of the day, though there were frustrations on both sides, which were stoked by inaccurate social media posts, this is how democracy works.”
Bovey added, “Despite a lot of vitriolic comments from people across the country who were misinformed by social media, our local community seems remarkably unified.”
Glad I could help.
BTW he also lost a job at a private school over his comment.
1 Like
He should have let his students loose in a Target store to raise a fuss and protest ICE instead of posting support on his social media dammit!!!
Doesn’t anybody understand how education and the role of teachers work these days!!
1 Like
So you are now agreeing it was wrong to fire teachers for their opinions on Charlie Kirk?
Welcome to the club!
Nope. Whiff again. They were fired for being pro murder lunatics. Normal people don’t want homicidal maniacs teaching their kids. Nobody has ever been fired for being opposed to Charlie Kirk. I will allow you to provide an example of you can find one.
1 Like
Who gets to decide that this was the motivation for their speech?
I could just as easily argue that saying “Go ICE” like one roots for a football team is agreeing that ICE can violate due process, civil rights, and murder people.
Does my opinion count in this case, or yours?
Nobody I don’t giva ■■■■ about their motivation. Neither should you. But if they come out as pro murder, we need to get them they hell away from kids.
But I am glad you’re opposed to firing someone for supporting law enforcement. That’s a start.
1 Like
That’s just crazy talk! Everyone knows that teachers are not allowed to use their kids for political activism. Unless it’s left-wing or Marxist activism of course.
2 Likes
You cant have it both ways. Expression of personal opinions is expression of personal opinion across the board. The content doesnt matter.
True. I only want it one way. Support for murder is not allowed. Especially around kids. Support for those trying to catch murders is allowed. Even around kids.
1 Like
The people who were upset believe he was expressing support for ICE’s unconstitutional acts.
Why in this case does your opinion outweigh theirs?
You are the one that’s allowed to determine the motivations behind people’s speech?
lol like hell it doesn’t matter. What an idiotic statement.
2 Likes
Content does matter. No one is getting fired for saying anything anti ice. In fact the anti-ice teachers are being allowed to let their classes have anti ice protests.
And here you claim to be a conservative and with every post prove you have never been a conservative.
1 Like
Look at you believing only democrats should be able to voice their opinion. Conservative voices need silenced. And you wonder how we know the democrat party is fascist.
Our democracy works so that if a group becomes irate because you said you support enforcing our laws, then the person can be fired?
Constitution be damned about free speech then. Mob rule.
Now I understand what Democrats mean when they say “our democracy”. That’s different than our constitutional democracy.
2 Likes
He should be evaluated by what he said, not by what some people made up without support.
2 Likes
We all need to have a clear understanding of how dangerous today’s socialist left democrat party is in America today.
These people demand compliance…nothing less.
This is a disgusting story.
1 Like
What a stupid post.
2 Likes
