To put it another way, when are you convinced that a biological male becomes a woman, or biological female becomes a man? Especially when you view gender norms as completely arbitrary. Exactly what is the objective scientific criteria that convinces you of this?
2 Likes
no answer. of course not there is nothing behind these decisions beyond woke lunacy
a need to create another âaggrieved groupâ which they can champion to maintain their relevance.
2 Likes
They cheered on a biological man stealing an NCAA womenâs swimming national championship, they defended a progressive school board that covered up a âtrans kidâ serial rapist, and theyâre fully on board with ruining lives over pronouns.
In short, theyâre lemmings and theyâll believe whatever the fashionable narrative tells them to believe wherever gender ideology is concerned.
3 Likes
Some folks on the left and the right are not in lock-step with every social and/or economic decision that members of the party who are in control make. So the question should not be âfor those on the Leftâ but rather for those who agree with this or that. As far as gender norms I think we are past that. There doesnât seem to be a norm that is a baseline for new laws being put in place in different states. I have not read a lot regarding this, but from what I have read there has not been anyone who has stated that these new laws are needed because the laws on the books are either incomplete, inconstant or flat out inadequate.
If a person is a she and wants to be a he, heâs a he. I donât give a â â â â if he or she has a vagina or a penis. Itâs simply not a priority to me.
4 Likes
Problem is it doesnât stop with what the person who is identifying as a he or she. There has been a movement to change what we call non trans people, a good example would be the Biden admin replacing the term âMothersâ with âBirthing Peopleâ in Maternal Health Guidance. I am referred to as a cis-male according to activists and the term has been widely adopted now, personally I donât want that title. Whatâs next sperm contributor instead of father.
I think the alteration of language is a huge deal and while it may be clichĂ© to bring it up it is straight up Orwellian and it should be pushed back against, itâs not just trans people they are altering the monikers for.
4 Likes
Thatâs ignorant.
3 Likes
Thatâs not true at all.
Iâm not going to validate or enable their mental illnessâŠand thatâs just what it is.
11 Likes
By that standard, what keeps perverted men from womens bathrooms?
My observation is that the media will support whatever the person says they are with the exception of accused mass murderers. Then they are willing to say that that claims are a sham and ignore preferred pronouns.
DudeâŠthe left canât even identify what a woman is. Letâs start there first. 
5 Likes
NowâŠhow about if they want to sexually parade themselves around and read books to childrenâŠany priorities in your world against that?
1 Like
So, no response? What then is the rational for wanting the entire country to kowtow to these individuals who have nothing medically (physical) wrong with them, who are either nothing but charlatans or mentally disturbed?
1 Like
It sounds like you might not have any daughters, or granddaughters,
2 Likes
I doubt youâll get a serious one. I got a couple about the virus, but participation is very limited.
It appears the Organic Intellectual Cabal is not interested in civil debate. Or perhaps incapable of it.
Just trolling.
Well, I put forth a very straightforward question appealing to logic and factual science and yet no response. All the Left does when it comes to this issue is get into semantical babble about âgenderâ and disguise it as a form of intellectualism.
1 Like
On of the things about crit, thereâs no substance there. Itâs just criticism.
It doesnât hold up to logic at all.
It relies on its own dictionary.
Perhaps @H_Arendt could enlighten us?
1 Like
