Healthcare is a Right - Amendment

The information from the American College of Emergency Physicians that I posted is “nonsense”? Okay, let’s try this one:

“In 1986, Congress enacted the Emergency Medical Treatment & Labor Act (EMTALA) to ensure public access to emergency services regardless of ability to pay. Section 1867 of the Social Security Act imposes specific obligations on Medicare-participating hospitals that offer emergency services to provide a medical screening examination (MSE) when a request is made for examination or treatment for an emergency medical condition (EMC), including active labor, regardless of an individual’s ability to pay. Hospitals are then required to provide stabilizing treatment for patients with EMCs. If a hospital is unable to stabilize a patient within its capability, or if the patient requests, an appropriate transfer should be implemented.”

More nonsense?

No. What is nonsense is your understanding of the “law”. Who does “The Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act" apply to?

I suspect the “law” may only apply to hospitals who have sold their souls in return for government cheese.

JWK

Elizabeth Warren wants elderly American citizens, who paid into Medicare all their lives, to surrender their healthcare to the millions of foreigners who have invaded America’s borders.

If you read the information I keep posting for your edification you wouldn’t have asked this easily-answered question. From what I posted minutes ago:

So what exactly do I not understand about this?

Sounds like my story. I feel real “entitled” too. :roll_eyes:

Well, you finally figured out the “Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act”, contrary to what you asserted, only applies to Medicare participating hospitals, requiring them to provide emergency care.

So, I was in fact correct in saying, the “law” may only apply to hospitals who have sold their souls in return for government cheese.

Glad you finally figured it out.

JWK

When it comes to healthcare, our democrat candidates running for office, and our looney socialists, have no moral compass whatsoever. They refuse to make the distinction between CHARITABLE GIVING and tax tyranny to support the needy.

I never asserted anything to the contrary.

I didn’t say you weren’t, even though your choice of words is preposterous.

You’re struggling to make a point here.

So says the one who pretends the Tenth Amendment does not protect hospitals from our federal government requiring them to provide free emergency care.

Struggle on my friend. The facts are what they are.

JWK

Elizabeth Warren wants elderly American citizens, who paid into Medicare all their lives, to surrender their healthcare to the millions of foreigners who have invaded America’s borders

Hahaha two “Conservatives” in this thread complaining about federally mandated health care insurance based on access rather than its existence.

Keep your government out of my mediacare is real!

Hahaha. You haven’t been paying attention to what actually is being argued. Try paying attention.

JWK

When it comes to healthcare, our democrat candidates running for office have no moral compass whatsoever. They refuse to make the distinction between CHARITABLE GIVING and tax tyranny to support the needy.

Can we please get this back on track?

1 Like

The OP’s hypothetical constitutional right is modeled after the 2nd amendment.

The second doesn’t require that government pay for people to own guns, so I doubt that the OP health right would either.

It would make access to particular healthcare options (e.g. abortion, gay conversion therapy) a constitutional issue.

Would it? So access to particular press options or arms options is a Constitutional issue?

Do we have a right to bear atom bombs? That’s a 2nd amendment issue. Do we have a right to bump stocks or AK’s or zip guns made from car antennas? Who pays for it isn’t a 2a issue.

Can we freely speak about fire in a crowded theater? Or publish classified secrets (ala wikileaks)? Can a murderer profit from a tell all book about their crime? Again, who pays the costs of speaking hasn’t been a 1st ammendment issue.

An amendment like the OP would address the abortion question more than it would the “who pays” question. “Health care as a right” is more a slogan than a call for a constitutional amendment.

Yes. I will not address again atom bombs.

Then why is it a healthcare issue?

Yes.

You don’t own those secrets.

Again, then why is it a healthcare issue?

Is it? Strange.

Strange assessment of what was actually said.

I didn’t say anything of the sort. You’ve don’t nothing in this thread but put words in my mouth and make false arguments. Congratulations on your time well spent.

No, Reason the left can’t get together and pay each others medical bills.

Some churches and other groups are already doing such things…

They don’t want to pay each other’s bills.

When it comes to healthcare, our democrat candidates running for office have no moral compass whatsoever. They refuse to make the distinction between CHARITABLE GIVING and tax tyranny to support the needy.

JWK

Elizabeth Warren’s Government sponsored capitalism is about fattening the fortunes of those holding political power with tax revenue, while regulating a free market, free enterprise system into submission, and then into extinction.

This “tax tyranny” is the worse. No one should have to pay taxes. The government and all its parts including the military should be payed for via charitable donations.

1 Like