You see⦠we are in agreement.
For what?
Your answer
Sorry, missed the news report of large swaths of people dying due to global warming. I do see a continued increase, though.
I answered it 3 times
I answered it 3 times
Nah you didnāt.
California, but whatevs.
You mean the forests that are on federal land?
GWH:
No, itās definitely bitching.
You see the parallels to race? Itās all critical theory.
But leftists they want wind and solar and batteries all right now
Solar wind etc is not going to run fully automated/robotic society. Some of that needs 3 phase equipment which required lots of electricity.
WuWei:
I answered it 3 times
Nah you didnāt.
Yes I did. For 5 of your events man didnāt exist. You claim there is now a 6th, and man is responsible.
You havenāt even shown the event exists, much less the cause, which according to you is completely different in every way from the first 5. If they even existed.
Itās not a troll.
What does the chart about coal mean in the real world?
Charts, plural. Weāve already shut down a bunch of coal fired plants.
WE HAVE NOT DONE NOTHING, contrary to your repeated lie. And we continue to do so. REAL WORLD.
Asking what that means is absolutely trolling. No doubt youāll continue.
Anyways I wasnāt expecting a real answer because denialism must be protected at all costs. The cognitive dissonance that would arise is too much.
So we do nothing and blame China.
Repeating the lie is trolling.
I understand that you are trying to say this is just a normal warming cycle. Sureā¦even if that were the case- can you folks at least acknowledge what rapid warming is already doing to this planet?
What has the warming done to our planet? Iād say nothing that has not occurred on a regular basis since the earth was formed.
Its like saying- hey meteors have hit this planet before so its just a natural cycle when a meteor hits our planet now.
It would be. Man wouldnāt ge the cause of the metor strike. Man COULD try to stop it, but the likely hood would be just about nil.
It would be. Man wouldnāt ge the cause of the metor strike. Man COULD try to stop it, but the likely hood would be just about nil.
Just checking- if a meteor was hurtling towards Earth- would you be this blasƩ about it?
Anyways I wasnāt expecting a real answer because denialism must be protected at all costs. The cognitive dissonance that would arise is too much.
You should pose a real question if you expect a real answer. The fact that your expectations were met is telling.
You should pose a real question if you expect a real answer. The fact that your expectations were met is telling.
Pretty simple question- who- or what- is causing the Holocene extinction?
Meteors are natural too. Would you say its just ānaturalā if it was hurtling towards Earth?
So you are admitting that climate change is Natural just like the metor hurtling at the earth. Correct?
This is the second year in a row where the sun looks a weird color because of massive fires burning 3000 miles away.
Are you implying in the history of the earth, there has NEVER been fires this bad?
So you are admitting that climate change is Natural just like the metor hurtling at the earth. Correct?
No - its anthropogenic. But its been like pulling teeth to get conservatives to even acknowledge global warming at all. I have noticed cons mostly conceding that point in the last decade.
The last significant extinction event happened between 13,000 and 10,000 years ago.
The nearest significant extinction event before that was 2 million years ago.
The next one, a million or two years before that.
70% of megafauna in either hemisphere are not going extinct at this time.
