Baghdad bob might not work here
Hmmm…
^*
The last time we had such an inquiry was 20 years ago. New courts, new cases, new day.
We shall see.
One of the great things about precedence is we rarely have to try the same issues over and over anew…
This is going to make a fine argument in court…
https://twitter.com/RudyGiuliani/status/1178806474073620482?s=20
The current courts are not bound by those prior precedence. They may use them to justify their own rulings if they so choose or as a means by which to avoid making a decision but they are not bound by same.
Good luck in court to you and Rudy!
Name the precipitating underlying crime.
For the president?
You want to compare this to Nixon?
Cite the comparable underlying crime precipitating the rest.
High crimes and misdemeanors… All that is needed to impeach a president…
No, try again.
- 201i believe
Are you under the delusion that the president can only be impeached for violating statutes? Most of the other convictions in Watergate were for perjury and/or obstruction of the investigation…
Keep on believing.
You put out the laundry list so again, what was the precipitating underlying crime?
Are you incapable of a straight answer?
Does Rudy still have his law license? Has anyone demanded his accounting information on how much time he’s charged trump? Don’t all attorneys keep a ledger to costs? Let’s see that ledger.
I’ve hired attorneys before. They even charge you for ever friggin stamp they use.
No such requirement exists to impeach
Deflect at all costs.
