You obviously don’t know any cops, do you???
Many crimes, attempted robberies, etc. that take place in public are occasionally foiled by anything that spooks the perpetrator. It’s not THAT uncommon. That’s how you have muggings gone wrong where someone is killed but nothing is taken.
Stop being so friggin gullible.
Which facts confirm beyond reasonable doubt that Trump colluded with Russia or obstructed justice? Mueller knew of none. He simply asserted the obvious, that he could not prove beyond all doubt a negative.
What spooked them, in this case?
I’ve already said I have no interest in entertaining your wacky conspiracy.
If you are charged with a crime in the state you live in, are you okay with the jury considering whatever hairbrained conspiracy the district attorney can cook up when considering your verdict?
Mueller already addressed the conspiracy of whether the DNC had anything to do with Seth Rich’s murder, and yes beyond a showdown of a doubt and didnt even have to.
Your insistence on continuing to proclaim the possibility exists has been addressed. The DNC while not under any obligation to prove their innocence was confirmed in due course.
The answer as to fact of why your conspiracy isnt true are already out there. You can keep posting it but it wont make any difference.
I suspect the murders themselves could come out and confess they did it without any impetus. And youd come right back here and say something equally stupid like, the DNC paid them off and made sure their families were taken care of just to take the fall.
You cling to a false narrative because you must. That’s what happens when you are not honest with yourself.
This is what happens with conspiracy folks like you. You are proven wrong…evidence is shown…you pivot and move the goal posts back.
There will always be a pivot with you on this. Your fun for a little bit but in the end the story must come to a close.
The disrespect of his parents is vastly more import and than your conspiracy. The right claims to be about family and family values.
If you find yourself within agreement with this statement you would stop this conspiracy now…walk away and let him rest.
But you and others can not because you are so heavily involved in it. The hate one has for the Democrats supercedes your desire for honor.
That’s why you saw people at the convention and rally’s with open arms taking Russian help. The power to punish your “enemies” is more powerful than a duty to ones country.
You would save yourself a lot of time if you simply admitted, “There are no facts I know of that clearly contradict the whatdoesitmean scenario.” Your verbosity doesn’t actually hide that truth.
Youd save yourself a lot of time if youd read the passages from the Mueller report that lay out the facts that address what you keep posting.
Pointed out at least 3 times already thus far. Would you like me to post them for you verbatim here?
I’ll start you out. Page 48.
"Beginning in the summer of 2016, Assange and WikiLeaks made a number of statements about Seth Rich, a former DNC staff member who was killed in July 2016. The statements about Rich implied falsely that he had been the source of the stolen DNC emails. "
There is nothing unusual or immoral in people speculating on the truth behind unsolved murders. What is unusual is the attempt by interest groups to shut down those speculations that reflect badly on themselves and to freely advance those speculations that leave themselves off the hook.
The Dems clearly care nothing for the feelings and safety of anyone they commandeer to further their agendas vis-vis Blaisie Ford and Stormy Daniels, who they have used and then discarded.
The censoring of theories that impugn Democrats and labeling them as untenable when there are no factual reasons for doing so, is a very suspicious behaviour. The term “obstruction of justice” comes to mind. And the Shakespearean line, " Methinks the lady doth protest too much. "
Forgive me, I was unaware that there had been a recent Church Council that had added the Mueller report to the canon of the Bible, and had canonised Mueller as a fifth evangelist.
What iron-clad evidence did Mueller cite that Russia was the source of the Wikileaks DNC email drop? Why do you believe Mueller. Was his report signed under oath?
If by shut down you mean present evidence that said conspiracies are full of poop, there is nothing unusual about that at all. In fact our society does that on the regular and for good reason.
So, what was that evidence? It is clear you have no facts that contradict the whatdoesitmean scenario, or you would have posted them by now. Do you have some other form of evidence besides facts?
The bible has zero to do with this. Wth kind of argument is that?
Are you really ready to walk yourself into a corner where you get to admit you only believe some parts of the report and not others based on a bias?
If you are I’ll be glad to present the next question to you.
Seriously? 6 posts above this one I posted an exact reference. If you arent even going to bother to address what is presented to you then I cant help you.
I’ll entertain conclusions I see credible evidence for. Those conclusions in the report with credible evidence I’m willing to believe. Those without credible evidence I would remian unconvinced on.
Are you ready to walk yourself into a corner by suggesting one must either believe all of a report or none of it, but cannot accept only parts of it?
Oh for ■■■■ sakes 
Mueller’s team asserting something to be false is not forensic proof of its falsity.
Would you like to find a safe space?
This is what happens with conspiracy folks like you. You are proven wrong…evidence is shown…you pivot and move the goal posts back.
You prove my point…thanks.
What for? I need only walk outside my door to hear from nearly anyone around me who isnt stepped in ■■■■■■■ crazy conspiracies and false premises, and that’s even with living in a deep red midwestern state.
I’m proven wrong because St. George signed a document asserting that Seth Rich was not the source of the Wikileaks DNC drop? And you say I’m gullible? 
