Wikileaks is testifying? And who represents them and when can we expect any testimony out of them?
AZslim
109
Yep. When a story is found to be fabricated by Russian trolls, hell, just make up your own!
I like it!
2 Likes
Just because something appears on a site that does lie, doesn’t mean everything appearing on their site is lies. Sometimes truth, or a close approximation, can achieve the desire effect.
AZslim
111
…but you are making up a scenario out of whole cloth to defend a story started Russian trolls. This makes zero sense.
4 Likes
[quote=“AZslim, post:111, topic:200604”]
…but you are making up a scenario out of whole cloth to defend a story started Russian trolls[/quote]
Well correct it then. There is an edit function.
I’m saying that Russian trolls don’t always get it wrong. Discounting a message merely because of the source is a logical fallacy.
What is a Genetic Fallacy?
Focuses on either accepting or rejecting an idea because of its source, rather than its merit.
Tell everyone again, which part of the Seth Rich was murdered because of the DNC has been corroborated? Any of it? Literally any of it?
Are you suggesting that you are more apt to believe in a hoax than to be in disbelief of what is in front of you?
I said the case is unresolved, therefore all viable scenarios are on the table. I haven’t said the whatdoesitmean scenario was 100% accurate. But it does fit the known facts as readily as any other scenario. Which facts clearly contradict the whatdoesitmean scenario?
And I said what viable solutions have been corroborated about the DNC being responsible for Seth’s murder or are even possible at this point?
Are you aware that the Mueller report addressed this issue? Are you aware of what is stated on the matter?
Come on now. Be better.
The case is unresolved so you get to have your fun.
Again, which facts clearly contradict the whatdoesitmean scenario?
Ah the pivot…sometimes it’s hard to let go…you should…you will be better for it
No, no, no…we’re not talking about a crowd that appreciates the nuances of ideology.
They’re far dumber than that. They just defend the idiot xenophobe no matter what. If it was Sweden that Trump owed money to and THEY helped him win, his idiot base would be defending THAT.
Are you blind? Read this one more time. What you are looking for is in Mueller report. There is no whatdoesitmean scenario. I have zero need to address a conspiracy scenario thought up on an anonymous website domain that has zero basis in rational thought and much more importantly the rule of law.
An actual investigation into the matter conducted under the aforementioned rule of law addressed this issue, and that wasnt even its mandate, it was taken care of just in the course of normal investigation of a completely different issue. If youd like to address this issue from the same point of reference, that being the law feel free to. Otherwise keep peddling wacky conspiracies that are easily debunked, and look as stupid as Fox “News” Did even allowing their station to let their opinion artists run with it, to the point of retraction and not allowing said individuals to say anything more about it.
1 Like
Children love fanciful tales. They also like to repeat them to others.
Childish adults are no different.
1 Like
There is a reason the Flat Earth Society isnt taken seriously by pretty much anyone…
Right. You don’t know of any facts that clearly contradict the whatdoesitmean scenario. Therefore, it remains a viable scenario. What is your preferred theory on why he was killed but nothing taken?
Missed it again. And again. Do you equally dismiss scenarios that suggest Trump was guilty of collusion or obstruction of justice?
So, you can cite no facts that clearly contradict the whatdoesitmean scenario. Don’t try to bury that admission in a multitude of irrelevant rhetoric. Just say, "There are no facts I know of that clearly contradict the whatdoesitmean scenario. "