Those aren’t election ballot drop boxes.
Those are mailboxes.
You didn’t answer the question
Why the limit?
Allan
Those aren’t election ballot drop boxes.
Those are mailboxes.
You didn’t answer the question
Why the limit?
Allan
Who decides “adequate”?
Those aren’t election ballot drop boxes.
Can you drop off your ballots in those?
Those aren’t election ballot drop boxes.
Those are mailboxes.
You didn’t answer the question
Why the limit?
Allan
Basically you can’t answer it, that’s why.
Allan
sensor
Why do you keep telling me I am not smarter than you?
altair1013:I’m still waiting for one person to explain how they will be prevented from voting.
No one is saying that.
Great! Then maybe they should stop calling it voter suppression?
Why the limit to drop boxes in Fulton county, Georgia?
Because drop boxes by nature are not secure. I have never used one. I vote in person. If I can’t do that, I vote absentee.
If I can do it, Anyone can. I don’t want to hear anyone bitching that it’s just too difficult.
Because drop boxes by nature are not secure
Neither are mailboxes.
Allan
altair1013:Because drop boxes by nature are not secure
Neither are mailboxes.
Except their is no guarantee that if you break into a mailbox you will find ballots. What will you find if you break into a drop box?
Less opportunities to vote equals less people voting.
Duh.
Allan
So if elections were held every sixth year, fewer people would vote every sixth year than would vote every fourth year under the present system?
Paul_Thomson:Some folks are concerned about how some of these new rules will make it more difficult to vote illegally.
And when you show me evidence of vast election fraud then I will agree with you.
Even if there is only some election fraud, you still should work out ways to stop that. If you allow some election fraud, the method used in the fraud will become a loophole to be exploited with impunity. Like allowing shoplifting under 1000 dollars make shoplifting under 1000 dollars become merely an alternative way to go shopping.
Great! Then maybe they should stop calling it voter suppression?
There is a difference.
Even if there is only some election fraud, you still should work out ways to stop that. If you allow some election fraud, the method used in the fraud will become a loophole to be exploited with impunity. Like allowing shoplifting under 1000 dollars make shoplifting under 1000 dollars become merely an alternative way to go shopping.
The first thing that has to happen is for both sides to admit that there is a small percentage of voter fraud.
But the reality is that any voter fraud has been so low that it doesn’t even come close to changing the outcome of any election.
And this kind of ■■■■ has to stop:
Texas' Dan Patrick (R) offered financial rewards for evidence of voter fraud. Then Pennsylvania's John Fetterman (D) came calling.
A very simple change would be either to have a public holiday on the day of the election or change the day to a Saturday.
It certainly looks as though the $1 million needs to be paid.
But the reality is that any voter fraud has been so low that it doesn’t even come close to changing the outcome of any election.
That’s your standard?
That’s your standard?
It not a standard but a fact.
Voter and election fraud in the United States is minimal. 100% no
3,000,000 votes cast in Arizona elections in 2020.
200 cases of fraud aka greater than 99% non fraudulent votes cast.
Allan
First. The dems are handling this poorly. What America is seeing, is a bunch of whining, blowhard politicians complaining about “voter suppression.” The problem? Nobody believes whining, blowhard politicians. So what to do? I have an idea. Sit down and shut up. Bring in actual voters and have them explain how voter laws will prevent them from voting in the next election. Let’s hear it from real people. Not the blowhards. If the blowhards have anything to say, let them explain how these laws will keep THEM from voting. They are subjected to the same laws ya know.
Brilliant idea. Right?
Already been done with voter ID laws and conservatives didn’t care.
When you don’t understand the question, it’s probably better not to go first.