Exactly. Proof would be demanded that something illegal or unethical had happened if this were a Democrat. None seems required here.
'And there is a huge, huge difference between someone walking away with tens of millions and someone getting a license that anyone is allowed to earn. Nor is the lying part involved with Noem.
What I “admitted” is that a mother would have a preference and concern for their daughter that they wouldn’t have for a stranger. It seems hardly an “admission” to me.
Now, if that meeting had included the governor asking why it was taking so long to make a decision on her daughters license and asked if her daughter needed to do or learn something additional to earn the license, would that be unethical or illegal?
Yeah, of course, except as Gov. you can’t create the appearance of impropriety by having a meeting with your daughter, the issuer and other officials from your administration.
As a mother, I would expect her to ask her adult child what she thinks could have gone wrong. If the daughter thought there was bias or unfair treatment in some way, an appropriate next step as gov. would be to recuse from eh situation and ask someone else to look into it.
If there was an indication of systemic issues with the problem, inquire with the issuers boss and ask them to review the process.
That would be appropriate. But why would that require a meeting with your adult child and the your subordinate, and some other people from your admin.?
Wouldn’t your adult child be able to ask that question of the issuer?
If you write between the lines. You may be mispelling.
The license was granted four months after the meeting. If anything, that would seem to imply deficiencies had been corrected.
There were several people involved in that licensing. Only one was fired. She was 70 years old. She believed that she was fired because of her age, as evidenced for her suit for age discrimination. Plus, if her daughter already had the license there is no motivation there for firing. Now if it had been the week before the license was granted it might have made a better arguement.
And this time lapse correlation is a big fail most of the time. How about:
License denied
Meeting
License granted
Riots in Seattle
issuer fired
i’m sure she would, when has that ever stopped a mother?
as for the people in the room. seems to be the right people given she’s the governor. anyone lower level would have been too much of a power differential. having the labor sec there to witness would be prudent, and the right person to do so.
Halarious all these libs would just throw their kid under the bus. Talk about weak leadership. If her kid was correct you can’t ignore it just because it is your kid. Although the meeting with the daughter involved shouldn’t have happened.