I am not a fan of mental gymnastics.
Funny how some die hard trump supporters miss little details like this one.
https://twitter.com/abcpolitics/status/1184882132763758594?s=21
he was referring to withholding due to corruption which he mentioned beforehand
thats what happens all the time
funny you wont link him clarifying that, saying outright there was no qpq. but you need a flimsy reason to impeach i understand.
now, can you show any republican senators who are acknowledging qpq, like the op article suggests?
Nailed it? In what ways is shoplifting - stealing something from someone who was in possession of what was stolen - equivalent to delaying a payment of money until closer to the final due date. By your measure, my delaying payment of my power bill from today, when I could pay it, until two weeks time when it is due, because they haven’t yet fixed my servicing transformer, would be equivalent to shoplifting. Really?
Let’s not hide the fact that the aid only was released when Trump was forced to obey the Whisteblower Report which told Congress what he was up to. You defense of Trump is equivalent to saying that if someone carries a bomb into a crowded square but then is arrested before they can detonate it, there was no crime.
thinkingman: mollyBrown: thinkingman: mollyBrown: TommyLucchese: thinkingman:can you show any republican senator acknowledging qpq?
thats what the thread’s about.
Way to duck a public admission by the guy that ■■■■■■■ did it.
Also from his chief of staff.
he did not acknowledge qpq. the narrative makers just made it sound that way for your benefit
Sure. Sure. It’s easier to believe that I am sure.
no just easier to believe zelentsky who did not acknowledge any qpq or pressure
mulvaney later clarified his remarks
I am not a fan of mental gymnastics.
can you show any republican senators acknowledging qpq?
thats what the article in the op says, or at least suggests.
Apocalypto:Funny how some die hard trump supporters miss little details like this one.
https://twitter.com/abcpolitics/status/1184882132763758594?s=21
he was referring to withholding due to corruption which he mentioned beforehand
thats what happens all the time
funny you wont link him clarifying that, saying outright there was no qpq. but you need a flimsy reason to impeach i understand.
now, can you show any republican senators who are acknowledging qpq, like the op article suggests?
Fat donald on live TV asking China and Ukraine to investigate the Bidens.
Whitaker was definitely a sign of things to come.
Okay that probably wins for stupid of the week! That’s why impeachment exists: to address abuse of power, not to address crimes.
thinkingman: Apocalypto:Funny how some die hard trump supporters miss little details like this one.
https://twitter.com/abcpolitics/status/1184882132763758594?s=21
he was referring to withholding due to corruption which he mentioned beforehand
thats what happens all the time
funny you wont link him clarifying that, saying outright there was no qpq. but you need a flimsy reason to impeach i understand.
now, can you show any republican senators who are acknowledging qpq, like the op article suggests?
Fat donald on live TV asking China and Ukraine to investigate the Bidens.
we know he asked them to do that
he didnt pressure anything in return
sorry
Apocalypto: thinkingman: Apocalypto:Funny how some die hard trump supporters miss little details like this one.
https://twitter.com/abcpolitics/status/1184882132763758594?s=21
he was referring to withholding due to corruption which he mentioned beforehand
thats what happens all the time
funny you wont link him clarifying that, saying outright there was no qpq. but you need a flimsy reason to impeach i understand.
now, can you show any republican senators who are acknowledging qpq, like the op article suggests?
Fat donald on live TV asking China and Ukraine to investigate the Bidens.
we know he asked them to do that
he didnt ask for anything in return
sorry
Fat donald was just joking with his abuse of power.
https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1180871476116889601?s=21
https://twitter.com/huffpost/status/1180928835384217600?s=21
any rep senators acknowledging qpq?
if you cant show it, just deflect with more huffpo
any rep senators acknowledging qpq?
if you cant show it, just deflect with more huffpo
You’re asking me?
I don’t need to. Fat donald asking China and the Ukraine to investigate the Bidens is an impeachable offense.
BTW, no one is stating that GOP reps or senators Are acknowledging qpq.
From the OP:
An increasing number of GOP senators are preparing to acknowledge that there was a quid pro quo
thinkingman:any rep senators acknowledging qpq?
if you cant show it, just deflect with more huffpo
You’re asking me?
I don’t need to. Fat donald asking China and the Ukraine to investigate the Bidens is an impeachable offense.
no it’s not. it’s trump’s job to seek out corruption. plus these things were agreed up in an earlier agreement with ukraine
that people think this is one of the biggest political cons of all time, thanks to the democrat loving anti-truth political media
Apocalypto: thinkingman:any rep senators acknowledging qpq?
if you cant show it, just deflect with more huffpo
You’re asking me?
I don’t need to. Fat donald asking China and the Ukraine to investigate the Bidens is an impeachable offense.
no it’s not. it’s trump’s job to seek out corruption. plus these things were agreed up in an earlier agreement with ukraine
that people think this is one of the biggest political cons of all time, thanks to the democrat loving anti-truth political media
You need to stop it bro. I just spit out my coffee.
BTW, no one is stating that GOP reps or senators Are acknowledging qpq.
From the OP:
An increasing number of GOP senators are preparing to acknowledge that there was a quid pro quo
thank you! finally
that they are “preparing” to do so is pure anti-trump pro liar schiff media narrative
thinkingman: Apocalypto: thinkingman:any rep senators acknowledging qpq?
if you cant show it, just deflect with more huffpo
You’re asking me?
I don’t need to. Fat donald asking China and the Ukraine to investigate the Bidens is an impeachable offense.
no it’s not. it’s trump’s job to seek out corruption. plus these things were agreed up in an earlier agreement with ukraine
that people think this is one of the biggest political cons of all time, thanks to the democrat loving anti-truth political media
You need to stop it bro. I just spit out my coffee.
umkay. laugh at reality.
but on your next gulp, try to keep in mind there was no pressure on ukraine for something in return for asking them to look into potential corruption (the qpq part your are deflecting from)
Apocalypto:BTW, no one is stating that GOP reps or senators Are acknowledging qpq.
From the OP:
An increasing number of GOP senators are preparing to acknowledge that there was a quid pro quo
thank you! finally
that they are “preparing” to do so is pure anti-trump pro liar schiff media narrative
No ■■■■ Sherlock. It was in the OP.
Now, answer my question. Do you agree with trump’s appointed EU ambassador that there was quid pro quo?
A simple yes or no answer will suffice. Thanks.
https://twitter.com/msnbc/status/1189150919683903488?s=21
no i agree with the nsc guy who was on the very call, the one where zelentsky outright said there was no pressure.
this was covered in another thread
We do do that all the time with foreign policy. Biden did it.
Why all the wondering about a quid pro quo when what was sought was an investigation into corruption? You can act like its for personal political gain, about on the same level as you can act like this inquiry is for personal political gain.
Regardless, there is nothing impeachable here and that is how the vote will go in the Senate.
This is a nothing and will be only an embarrassment to those who started it.
Naturally, to the Trump haters they think they got him, to Republicans they think this is garbage. To those in the middle it is an irrelevancy. Just the way any fake impeachment would go.
no i agree with the nsc guy who was on the very call, the one where zelentsky outright said there was no pressure.
this was covered in another thread
I need to get more coffee (Thanks BTW ) and walk my dog, but i’ll temporarily leave you with the simple fact that fat donald will be impeached.
Whether he gets impeached for quid pro quo, abuse of power, obstruction of justice, money laundering or all of the above…he will get impeached.