Global warming is real

[SixFoot]

Speaking of natural cycles, check out that beautiful global warming Missouri is getting this week. If we get some sun at the right time tomorrow, we might even break 70!

Windows are open and the pond frogs are singing away.

[Smyrna]

@SixFoot

Must have something to do with that pesky natural cycle that’s been going on since before our species.

Talk to me Goose!

[gooddad409]

@SixFoot

Speaking of natural cycles, check out that beautiful global warming Missouri is getting this week. If we get some sun at the right time tomorrow, we might even break 70!

Windows are open and the pond frogs are singing away.

My wife hates frogs singing. City girl.

[Samm]

@Borgia_dude

@Samm

Then why did you repost it?

And why are you making up what I believe? Didn’t you get what I said about that graph? Sorry, but I’m not going to explain it to you again. You are going to have to go back and reread the thread.

I reposted because you put a lot of stock in that graph showing the trend. I have no idea why since it excludes data from 1855 to today. Luckily I provided the updated data which you have studiously ignored.

The only one here who is obsessed with that graph is you.

And I explained why the graph only goes to 1855. You studiously ignored me.

[Samm]

@Borgia_dude

@Samm

@Borgia_dude

@Samm

@Borgia_dude

@Samm

@Borgia_dude

@Grimalken

What is earth normal, as it applies to temperatures? Do you know?

All this hand wringing over temperature, and for all you know the planet is just trying to naturally adjust. So when was earth normal, 1750? 1850? 1950? 2050?

There is no normal for the planet. On that we agree. But there is a normal range right now.

Science has plenty of ways to discern temperatures before thermometers. It’s science.

So normal is apparently whatever you want to call it, right?

No. It’s what temperature history and science say it is. You disagree?

In that case, there is no reason for you to be alarmed about the temperature today. Its normal.

Ok. I’m not sure I agree with your definition of normal. Nor do scientists.

So what do scientists call normal?

Or perhaps more appropriately, what do scientist say is abnormal about today’s temperature?

You can google, can’t you?

I did. I got 473,765 hits. You need to narrow it down for me.

[Borgia_dude]

@Samm

@Borgia_dude

@Samm

Then why did you repost it?

And why are you making up what I believe? Didn’t you get what I said about that graph? Sorry, but I’m not going to explain it to you again. You are going to have to go back and reread the thread.

I reposted because you put a lot of stock in that graph showing the trend. I have no idea why since it excludes data from 1855 to today. Luckily I provided the updated data which you have studiously ignored.

The only one here who is obsessed with that graph is you.

And I explained why the graph only goes to 1855. You studiously ignored me.

No, I explained why the graph was useless because it only went to 1855. I then posted the updated graph to more recent years, which you have yet to comment on.

[Borgia_dude]

@Smyrna

@SixFoot

Must have something to do with that pesky natural cycle that’s been going on since before our species.

Talk to me Goose!

Perhaps you might look into why the ice in Antarctica is thickening (in some locations) instead of revelling in your ignorance of the subject.

[WolfyT]

This will probably be a hotter year than it otherwise would have been now that global dimming has been reduced by Coronavirus. Although this winter was hot already relatively. The arctic will probably have a big melting season this year.

[Samm]

No … you just obsessed about the graph. An apparently, you still are.

[Borgia_dude]

@Samm

No … you just obsessed about the graph. An apparently, you still are.

Ok. I understand your reluctance since it has been debunked as evidence against global warming.

[Smyrna]

@Borgia_dude

Ok. I understand your reluctance since it has been debunked as evidence against global warming.

Gretta…is that you?

[Borgia_dude]

@Smyrna

@Borgia_dude

Ok. I understand your reluctance since it has been debunked as evidence against global warming.

Gretta…is that you?

Are you begging for attention?

[SixFoot]

@Smyrna

Gretta…is that you?

[Samm]

@Borgia_dude

@Samm

No … you just obsessed about the graph. An apparently, you still are.

Ok. I understand your reluctance since it has been debunked as evidence against global warming.

How can you interpret my not wanting to rehash this graph for the third time as being reluctant to discuss it? If you want to go over it again, reread the thread, it’s all there. And the graph has not been debunked as evidence. It is an accurate portrayal of the proxy temperatures extracted from that specific ice core, and it is consistent with the hundreds of other ice core data strings taken on Greenland and Antarctica. You are the only person here trying to say that it is something more than that so if there is and debunking to be done, it is in regard to the false claims you are now making against me. But rather than get into that, why don’t you just move on. You have driven nearly everyone else out of here with your silly obsession with this graph. Maybe you can come up with something new on the thread topic for them to debate with you about.

[Samm]

@Borgia_dude

@Smyrna

@Borgia_dude

Ok. I understand your reluctance since it has been debunked as evidence against global warming.

Gretta…is that you?

Are you begging for attention?

I love irony.

[Borgia_dude]

@Samm

@Borgia_dude

@Samm

No … you just obsessed about the graph. An apparently, you still are.

Ok. I understand your reluctance since it has been debunked as evidence against global warming.

How can you interpret my not wanting to rehash this graph for the third time as being reluctant to discuss it? If you want to go over it again, reread the thread, it’s all there. And the graph has not been debunked as evidence. It is an accurate portrayal of the proxy temperatures extracted from that specific ice core, and it is consistent with the hundreds of other ice core data strings taken on Greenland and Antarctica. You are the only person here trying to say that it is something more than that so if there is and debunking to be done, it is in regard to the false claims you are now making against me. But rather than get into that, why don’t you just move on. You have driven nearly everyone else out of here with your silly obsession with this graph. Maybe you can come up with something new on the thread topic for them to debate with you about.

Do we agree it is not evidence against global warming? With the up to date data added, it is evidence FOR global warming.

[Samm]

This Coronavirus is the ■■■■■■ It’s even got global warming on hold. Here we are past the vernal equinox and we just dug out from 10 inches of snow with another foot on the way to be followed by temperatures down to twenty below. What the hell, over?

[westaussie]

Compare and contrast: Perth, WA is forecast to be 37 C (98.6 F) on Thursday.

[Sunovagun]

Maybe global warming is good. Don’t those medical guys in the know say that viruses tend to subside in warmer weather?
OMG
(Orange Man Good).

[westaussie]

I believe Trump was pushing that particular anti-science nonsense.