Not sure why there’s so much dislike for Gabbard?
Tulsi Gabbard's 2020 Campaign May Be Over Before It Starts
The congresswoman from Hawaii’s past is filled with anti-LGBTQ activism, calls for bombing Syria and endorsing torture
Not sure why there’s so much dislike for Gabbard?
Even if she was disadvantaged by google, there is no requirement for them to be neutral.
Part of the dislike is this little nugget:
According to the official, the 35-year-old Hawaii congresswoman is being looked as a candidate for secretary of state, secretary of defense or United Nations ambassador. If selected, Gabbard will be the first woman as well as the youngest pick for Trump’s Cabinet.
Again, not sure why that is a bad thing. Do we want his cabinet to be staffed solely by right wing ideologues?
Also, this little nugget:
No one in their right ■■■■■■■ mind would even consider working in that piece of ■■■■■ cabinet…no one.
Great. So, we do not want an anti-war voice in his cabinet. Just neocons. That’s what we’re going with.
I think a number of folks are upset with her because she lit into Kamala ,last debate,and made her look bad.
The anti-war voices seem to keep leaving. It doesn’t seem like Trump values their contributions to his cabinet, so they leave.
Great. So, we do not want an anti-war voice in his cabinet. Just neocons. That’s what we’re going with.
She was never a Democrat. She just plays one on TV. Just like Bernie was never a democrat (I voted for him) but plays one when it’s convenient.
Good, she never had a chance anyway.
The anti-war voices seem to keep leaving. It doesn’t seem like Trump values their contributions to his cabinet, so they leave.
That may or may not be true. In any case, having that anti-war stance to check psychopaths like Bolton is worth being in the vicinity of Trump.
AngraMainyu:Great. So, we do not want an anti-war voice in his cabinet. Just neocons. That’s what we’re going with.
She was never a Democrat. She just plays one on TV. Just like Bernie was never a democrat (I voted for him) but plays one when it’s convenient.
Party over policy? Yeah…
No.
AngraMainyu: madasheck:Polls out today, as reported by MSNBC, show both don’t have enough support to be next debate. Glad to see Gabbard go. Steyer was never a factor.
Not sure why there’s so much dislike for Gabbard?
I think a number of folks are upset with her because she lit into Kamala ,last debate,and made her look bad.
Maybe. I personally enjoyed it.
Party over policy? Yeah…
No.
Yeah, she would have been a massive influence on fat donald.
gooddad409: AngraMainyu: madasheck:Polls out today, as reported by MSNBC, show both don’t have enough support to be next debate. Glad to see Gabbard go. Steyer was never a factor.
Not sure why there’s so much dislike for Gabbard?
I think a number of folks are upset with her because she lit into Kamala ,last debate,and made her look bad.
Maybe. I personally enjoyed it.
Me too.
There’s also this article in Rolling Stone. You do have to wonder why Bannon & David Duke like her so much, even though she says she rejects their support.
The congresswoman from Hawaii’s past is filled with anti-LGBTQ activism, calls for bombing Syria and endorsing torture
Yep, and you see what happens to those who he no longer wants around. Fired by tweet.
Never had a chance and letting anyone with a pulse be part of debates has run its course.
Then, there’s also this little nugget:
Hawaii Rep. Tulsi Gabbard, a 2020 candidate for president, told Fox News on Sunday that Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election found "no collusion" between President Trump and...
Hawaii Rep. Tulsi Gabbard a 2020 candidate for president, told Fox News on Sunday that Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election found “no collusion” between President Trump and Russia – and that it’s time for the country to focus on the issues that matter most to Americans.