First… there had to be shared consequence. Then ABORTION!!!
Now it is nonsense buzzwords.
It’s pretty great.
Your whining about mental healthcare. And saving her.
It’s not nonsensical, it’s not “ever shifting” and it’s not a concept.
What shared consequence is there in an abortion?
Did the lady “pitch a puppy” or did she take the dog with her? You do realize she died too?
Definite beliefs are for groups. Groups are for suckers. 
1 Like
You can’t be serious. Scratch that, I know you’re not.
1 Like
Does not compute, eh? 
Then you should revel in her freedom as well.
Aren’t both choices?
He’s got a point. You are a member of an elite group right?
I am?? What other SixFoot fantasies have you got? 
Maybe… and just maybe… and no here me out here… some see a woman hurling herself 60 stories with her dog because of the inability to treat her depression as a tragedy and not as an expression of FREEDOM!!!
Just maybe.
Wild… I know.
Wait… so we are BACK to the idea of shared consequence so quickly after it has been ejected?
Is there an actual track to all of this?
You’re special forces aren’t you?
And authoritarian high modernism tells you you can “fix it”.
Yeah, I know.
Holy crap.
Buzzwords.
The very one that I predicted will be used a few posts ago.
The last attempt to salvage the really dumb argument.
It is pretty entertaining.
I never left it
Yeah you did.
So do i have the freedom to drop puppies from my roof or not?
No, psychology and philosophy, mostly the former. And of course there is the praxis. It is very real.
Why is my argument any “dumber” than yours?
Do you?
Mine is about FREEDOM.
Do I have that freedom or not?
