That pier is not at the shipping channel. The main piers are (were) somewhat (but obviously not well enough) protected by a structural belt and bollards.
A month to put together and award destruct/salvage contracts. (Assuming they get emergency funding.)
Two to three months the clear the shipping channel and around the piers.
Six to eight months to review and update the structural design. (This can commence as soon as funding is secured.)
Two years to reconstruct the bridge (assuming they can get the materials.)
I have reason to be. I have been there and done that. Award of contracts in emergencies can be accomplished amazingly fast as long as everyone cooperates. I did a Federal Hwy funded emergency bridge repair project (which involved complete replacement of a pier) on the Dalton Highway from the initiation of the design to bid opening for the construction in twenty days. The Contractor was on the job site working 30 days after my boss had called me into his office and assigned me the task.
The thirty days to contract is simply for removing the downed structure, not to rebuild the bridge. That is far simpler than my project.
In this case, you not talking simply about downed structure. Youâre talking about a ship with downed structure on top of it in a navagible water way. For the ship alone there are (at least) two federal agencies that want accountability alone.
The ship is the least of their problems. Cut the steel that hangs on it loose from the rest, and they can simply float it away. The steel in the water will have to be cut into manageable sized pieces (much of that cutting done by divers) and lifted out one piece at a time. But once the shipping lane span is cleared out, the port can reopen while they clear the debris from the other two spans. Just watch, once that contract is let, theyâll have that port open in two months, three at most.
The ship is not the least of the problem. The ship IS the problem. Itâs a 100K plus tons of steel sitting in the middle of a navigable water way with a few hundred tons of unstable busted bridge sitting on itâs bow.
Yes itâs afloat, it would be better if it were sunk.
Take a look at the pictures, that orangish color on the hull should be parallel with the waterline. Itâs not, because there is too much weight on the bow creating trim forward. You start cutting that weight off without some form of compensation the bow will pop up like a cork and screw a lot of peopleâs day up.
Youâre thinking in terms of static loads, this aint. Depending on the tide, there is a highly variable amount of stress involved.
No problem. Donât take the weight off all at once. In fact, that would be very hard to do. Itâll be easier to take it off in small manageable pieces. And they can unload containers as needed too. Any way you look at it, itâs far better that the ship is afloat and that it and its cargo are not lying on the bottom in the channel.
Not to veer too far into the deep on theories/conspiraciesâŚitâs not what Iâm saying.
But you have to consider the timing of what happened. A little earlier and they might have been able to stop, or course correct. A little later and they would have been clear. And whatever that turn was, it took them head-on into the support.
Thatâs gotta be a big part of the investigation.
I heard somewhere the ship sent the warning right away and saved a lot of cars from crossing.
Death toll would be higher but the ship acted insantly to send out warning.