I read your post.
It’s still there.
Maybe you should re-read it.
Either way, keep being awesome!!!
I read your post.
It’s still there.
Maybe you should re-read it.
Either way, keep being awesome!!!
Classical liberals.
Only one person that went to jail in McCarthy era, and that was for obvious and undeniable perjury.
No I do not believe I am shifting the subject. The founders were deadset againstbm things like politically-addled judges, suspendeing habeas corpus w/o good cause, and jailing one’s political opponents.
That is exactly what classical liberals believe and modern liberals do woing, and that is exactly what we have been discussing.
I said persecuted.
And you are trying too hard. You are looking at history through modern day biases and as a result you have this fantastical version of the past
You sure read it. It’s almost like you know it’s true that you had to reduce the argument to absurd.
Can’t stop wont stop being awesome
I believe that political persecution (weapoizing the justice system) is wrong, and that our nation was founded on opposing it.
I believe the Dems have made that one of their primary tools.
I believe if Donald Trump actually did that thing he thought about for a few seconds, then he would be little better than the Dems in that regard.
The left became that what it fought. That’s how it always happens. You collective aren’t classical liberals. Both of those things are true.
Hmm 'You collectively". . . .
Yeah, that statement has some merit.
Trump 1.0 increased spending quite a bit so, yes, it is fair to say MAGA is not classical liberals"
The Revelation!
See, the Revelation!
Juke Joint Jezebel’s coming,
For my cremation!Next thing you know there’s going to be Fema camps.
Wow someone else knows/likes that song?
You sure read it. It’s almost like you know it’s true that you had to reduce the argument to absurd.
Can’t stop wont stop being awesome
I have a feeling we’ll be seeing you at the next “outrage.”
You’re extremely predictable.
Any ideas yet how we got to this one??
The left became that what it fought.
You may recall that every time Donald Trump got indicted, his poll numbers rose I am part of that crowd.
Moreover, Donald Trump one the popular vote 49.8% to 48.3%.
If they had just ------ not tried to put him in jail, they would have won and today they woule be passing budgets, nominating Supreme Court Justices and setting border policy.
FreeAndClear:
You sure read it. It’s almost like you know it’s true that you had to reduce the argument to absurd.
Can’t stop wont stop being awesome
I have a feeling we’ll be seeing you at the next “outrage.”
You’re extremely predictable.
Any ideas yet how we got to this one??
Can you point to my other outrages that made me extremely predictable ?
Are you sure you are not confusing posters …. Again?
Can you point to my other outrages that made me extremely predictable ?
Are you sure you are not confusing posters …. Again?
We’ll settle this real quick. Grab your device that you’re posting from, walk to the closest mirror and see who’s looking back at you.
That’s the person I’m talking about.
Can you point to my other outrages that made me extremely predictable ?
Are you sure you are not confusing posters …. Again?
You can also look in your wallet…check your paystub…answer security questions…find all the pictures that include bicycles…
FreeAndClear:
Can you point to my other outrages that made me extremely predictable ?
Are you sure you are not confusing posters …. Again?
We’ll settle this real quick. Grab your device that you’re posting from, walk to the closest mirror and see who’s looking back at you.
That’s the person I’m talking about.
Yeah i figured that’s what it was. You are assuming again. Because that’s the only way for you to make your argument - to assume and then Attack the assumption. Kudos on the try
FreeAndClear:
Can you point to my other outrages that made me extremely predictable ?
Are you sure you are not confusing posters …. Again?
You can also look in your wallet…check your paystub…answer security questions…find all the pictures that include bicycles…
. Some kind of roll
All because i called you honest. Weird.
Like oknow35 said, it depends on who and why.
If a local militia were to try and overthrow the government of Texas, is it OK to kill them on the battlefield?
Of do we need to capture them, give them a full jury trial, and when found guilty execute them instead?
It’s just one example off the top of my head.
Yeah i figured that’s what it was. You are assuming again. Because that’s the only way for you to make your argument - to assume and then Attack the assumption. Kudos on the try
Hey, if you’ve been hacked, or someone else is posting from your account, maybe just let the mods know.
FreeAndClear:
Yeah i figured that’s what it was. You are assuming again. Because that’s the only way for you to make your argument - to assume and then Attack the assumption. Kudos on the try
Hey, if you’ve been hacked, or someone else is posting from your account, maybe just let the mods know.
Never give up never surrender.
If a local militia were to try and overthrow the government of Texas, is it OK to kill them on the battlefield?
That’s not what habeas corpus means.
And that’s not what @ohknow35 said
He referenced a specific set of events that occurred in 2020 (at least in part and parts of it were imagined) as a hypothetical for suspension of habeas corpus. Like any defender of the constitution would.