Mask mandates were in place.
Do you deny it?
Mask mandates were in place.
Do you deny it?
Sounds like you are angry at the governors of Louisiana and Arkansas for reinstating mask mandates. Write a stern letter?
Again, you don’t know what the numbers would have been without the mask mandates in place.
I know two people who died from a car crash while wearing a seatbelt. I also know 2 people who survived a car crash while not wearing a seatbelt…. Therefore I decree that seatbelts do not work.
I’m not angry at anybody. Ever.
WuWei:Mask mandates were in place.
Do you deny it?
Again, you don’t know what the numbers would have been without the mask mandates in place.
I’m sure you can make some up.
Where the mask mandates in place…yes or no?
I know two people who died from a car crash while wearing a seatbelt. I also know 2 people who survived a car crash while not wearing a seatbelt…. Therefore I decree that seatbelts do not work.
Masks don’t work for me. I cheat as often as possible.
I know two people who died from a car crash while wearing a seatbelt. I also know 2 people who survived a car crash while not wearing a seatbelt…. Therefore I decree that seatbelts do not work.
No you don’t.
Speculation without any science.
SottoVoce: WuWei: Orygun:BUt MaSkS DoNT WoRk!!
https://www.foxnews.com/media/biden-covid-adviser-americans-need-to-wear-n95-masks
Not effective.
Not very effective.
Very effective.Does “not very effective” mean “not effective?” Is a preventative measure which is “not very effective” the same as a preventative measure which is “not effective?” Is the argument that unless something is “very effective” it shouldn’t be done?
Yes.
…
Compared to N95 masks, cloth masks aren’t very effective. People shouldn’t use cloth masks.
Compared to 4% chlorhexidine gluconate, plain soap isn’t very effective. People shouldn’t use soap.
Got it.
You are ignoring the risks associated with the use of low effectivity measures during a respiratory epidemic.
If you’re really serious about masking at least wear the right masks.
Otherwise it’s fools gold.
Compared to N95 masks, cloth masks aren’t very effective. People shouldn’t use cloth masks.
Compared to 4% chlorhexidine gluconate, plain soap isn’t very effective. People shouldn’t use soap.
Got it.
My mask sucks. No matter which one I use. It’s mostly used as a chin strap anyway. Which means it sucks as protection.
You are ignoring the risks associated with the use of low effectivity measures during a respiratory epidemic.
What are the risks?
False security.
theres talk of a lambda variant now too, more resistant to vaccine
how many of you still think this came naturally from a bat?
lol.
WuWei:You are ignoring the risks associated with the use of low effectivity measures during a respiratory epidemic.
What are the risks?
Over confidence in ineffective measures. Distancing is a better mitigation than masking. For example.
Orygun:Everything has changed now,” Hutchinson said. “And yes in hindsight, I wish that had not become law. But it is the law. And the only chance we have is either to amend it or for the court to say that it has an unconstitutional foundation.”
What about proving to the citizens with science and stats and good faith debating, letting all sides present their cases, that the masks some have been using actually work to reduce the spread, and letting people make what they believe are the most logical choices.
Why is that not also “a chance”?
Stamping out dissent is not going to win hearts and minds.
Meh. It’s been made perfectly clear that the hearts and minds of anti vaxxers aren’t up for grabs. We may as well stamp out misinformation, conspiracy theories, and outright lies.