FBI Seizures From Safe Deposit Boxes Violated US Constitution

FBI raid on safe deposit vault violated the U.S. Constitution, a federal appeals court ruled.

In that raid FBI seized millions of dollars, jewelry and other personal effects regardless of any proof or evidence of crimes committed from those that safe deposit box that was raided. And in some cases, evidence seized was use to open up other investigations.

This was IMO a clear case of violation 4th Amendment.

Here are 2 links, one from far left

and one from right.

Now it’s in my opinion that FBI knew damn well search and seize was a direct violation of the 4th but went ahead and did it anyway.

Now my question is who’s going to be charged for this crime against those people?

Also why mainstream media hasn’t picked up on this? One the fringe media on both sides posted this story?

Just thinking out loud…

1 Like

Of course they did. It was all planned.

No one. “Violating the 4th Amendment” isn’t actually a crime.

Because it won’t get as many clicks as another story about Trump would.

You’re a little late to the story - the raid happened 3 years ago. It was all over the news then, and again in 2022 when the District Court ruled for the FBI.

should it be?

Story was posted here on this forum, I searched but kept getting error. Forum was timing out.

In 2022 court ruled there was no 4th Amendment violation.

9th U.S. Circuit Court unanimously reversed the lower court’s decision on Tuesday.

Sure. But it won’t be, ever. Your cop-loving compatriots on the right will make sure of that.

And your authoritarian libs will make sure of it.

damn right

What?

There’s no question that they knew ahead of time. Only the most dedicated (R)etar(D)s would even entertain the notion that they didn’t.

3 Likes

This is the type of activity that lax civil forfeiture laws lead to. The story indicates that the FBI was planning on using civil forfeiture to keep all the items taken.

5 Likes

Law should be simple: No search without probable cause and a warrant. No seizure with out bringing a charge against the owner relating the property to a crime. And no forfeiture without a conviction on the related crime.

5 Likes

And criminal penalties for doing it.

1 Like

If this was the conclusion of the 9th Circuit…you know the FBI did wrong but…NO ONE WILL BE PUNISHED FOR THIS CRIME!

That would fall under a separate, but very real, issue of “Official Repression.” I think this case is a ripe example of official repression. I see every indication that seizure for civil forfeiture was one of the original objectives of the search.

1 Like

And what is the date on the reports about the 9th Circuit Court decision?

2 Likes