The skirt is immaterial.
DisturbedGuy: RTchoke: DisturbedGuy: Oldandtired:Here we go with she deserved it.
Stop putting words in people’s mouth. That is absolutely not what was ssid.
Then why keep bringing up the 2 other encounters as if that matters?
She said no. That’s what matters.
It’s just a different way of saying she wore her skirt too short.
Oh goodie…another member of the haven’t read the thread club. I clearly stated about 400 post ago that he was guilty and should be punished accordingly. You all should keep making it about me though.
Oh, I’ve read it. I just don’t see why pointing out 2 other consensual encounters have any bearing on the one encounter that resulted in rape is a winning argument.
It is no different than saying she asked for it because she said yes before.
It is because the board ran with this was all because of transgender bathroom policies when that is clearly not the case l.
Serial sexual assaulter. Let’s hear you whimble about moral fiber and proper fathering.
Now Xi is.
I don’t know what that other gibberish is supposed to mean.
Seems to me that the only one vulnerable are women who the left have thrown up the bus for their new special group.
when that is clearly not the case l.
Yes it is.
RTchoke: DisturbedGuy: RTchoke: DisturbedGuy: Oldandtired:Here we go with she deserved it.
Stop putting words in people’s mouth. That is absolutely not what was ssid.
Then why keep bringing up the 2 other encounters as if that matters?
She said no. That’s what matters.
It’s just a different way of saying she wore her skirt too short.
Oh goodie…another member of the haven’t read the thread club. I clearly stated about 400 post ago that he was guilty and should be punished accordingly. You all should keep making it about me though.
Oh, I’ve read it. I just don’t see why pointing out 2 other consensual encounters have any bearing on the one encounter that resulted in rape is a winning argument.
It is no different than saying she asked for it because she said yes before.
It is because the board ran with this was all because of transgender bathroom policies when that is clearly not the case l.
Well goodie for the board. Might want to go back and see where I never mentioned any of that.
He talks too fast for me, but he is very intelligent.
I don’t think I would agree. But you’re certainly welcome to your opinion. And, it’s fun to watch.
Still blaming the young lady I see as well as her father.
I quoted that above. That’s not the problem. The problem is a frothy-mouthed moral panic from the parental responsibility crowd.
It doesn’t matter one bit what anyone was wearing.
There was no trans- policy in place. This was a predatory male attacking a female, once he had groomed and isolated her.
Is that what they’re doing?
It doesn’t matter one bit what anyone was wearing.
It absolutely matters.
There was no trans- policy in place.
Yes there was.
How do you read ‘predator rapes girl’ as ‘girl causes own rape’?
Do they sell that PoMo confabulator on the back of your breakfast cereal box?
And, wrong.
It doesn’t matter one bit what anyone was wearing.
I agree.
DisturbedGuy: WuWei: DisturbedGuy:Of course it does because it feeds the culture war.
You deny it?
I do because you still haven’t given any context to the “skirt” the perpetrator was wearing.
The “culture war”.
I realize the fact he may have been wearing a skirt makes you feel icky, but it doesn’t change the facts of the incident that happened.
It absolutely matters.
Did it matter the other two times they met in the bathroom?
And, wrong.
And right. When was the rape?
WuWei:It absolutely matters.
Did it matter the other two times they met in the bathroom?
Yes.
…
Sknyluv: WuWei:It absolutely matters.
Did it matter the other two times they met in the bathroom?
Yes.
…
You have no way of knowing this.
I realize the fact he may have been wearing a skirt makes you feel icky, but it doesn’t change the facts if the incident that happened.
It doesn’t make me feel “icky”. What disgusts me is the denial of the repercussions of the policies of your© culture.