The freedom to choose must be taken away, because you will choose incorrectly.
- Religion
- Family
- Media
- Education system
- Legal system
The generators of culture (along with some others no doubt).
Which of them is not a critical justice target?
I should have put education at the top.
“Them”. “They”.
Who?
Funny you should mention this.
“Culture” is the result, not a predicate. It’s not a constant, to be supplanted by another constant.
It is easy - arguably, the easy way out - to cast all opposing views as existential threats.
The Woke.
Why?
Yes, it is the result. The product of the culture generators I mentioned.
Yes, it is to be supplanted by another. There is not one.
Without a value judgment?
Who are “the Woke”?
Why do we care about “the Woke’s” views?
Personal anecdotes. I was going to share them, but I changed my mind - and forgot to delete the residual sentence.
Well, that’s a matter of how you look at it.
There is only one “Culture” at any given moment in time, but there are always endless “cultures”.
Sometimes it’s hard to understand exactly what we’re talking about.
Determining that a “threat” is existential is almost always a value judgement.
The people taking over the culture generators.
Because they are taking over the culture generators and destroying liberalism.
Understood.
No there isn’t only one ever. Not in a country of this size.
Did I make a value judgment? Have I used the word “threat”.
“Culture” has never been liberal.
And yes, I’m using the right definition.
Danke.
There are always many “cultures”. There are one or zero “Cultures”.
Discourse creates terminology.
Did you?
If a culture is in danger of being subsumed, is that not an existential threat?
What do you mean? Is liberalism a culture?
Disagree.
To that culture. If I am Woke (in this case) it is a pending victory.
No, liberalism is an ideology.
Ok. Noted, I guess.
What is “culture”, if it can be so easily tossed aside?
What is “woke”, if not an aspect of “culture”?
I’m going to officially tag out for now.
Maybe I’ll come back later, but I’m done right now.
1 Like
And when it is the prevailing ideology of a group of people who start a country?
I really don’t agree with your statement here. I don’t think it is that simple.
There is never zero.
Easily? No.
A strategy for assuming power. A culture. An ideology seeking to supplant liberalism.
I’m still tagged out.
But in the meanwhile, from my perspective I see an ideology as describing what should be, and culture as what is.
I disagree.
Marxism, socialism, and communism are manifestation of humanism. As is cancel culture, being woke, etc. They all sound good to the naive in theory, but always end up causing more problems than they claim they can solve.
In my opinion we are seeing a increase in humanism. Mostly due to an increase in the indoctrination of it in our youth(naive), coupled with the exploitation of it by the ones who want to use it for their advantage or agenda.
Yes; i believe it is and is been done incrementally, not in the form of s conspiracy by any specific group. More so by the inherit arrogance of mankind.
?
Who are the instigators? Who is consciously deciding to apply Gramsci’s strategy?
No.
Definition of intersectionality
the complex, cumulative way in which the effects of multiple forms of discrimination (such as racism, sexism, and classism) combine, overlap, or intersect, especially in the experiences of marginalized individuals or groups
Come on man. I gave you names.
you posted what I just said. Now go read Crenshaw.
This is the Soviet Cold War conspiracy without the Soviets. Never goes away. Actually goes all the way back a hundred years to “Judeo-Bolshevism” and the Red Summer.
Gramsci was a fan of both Lenin and Stalin, although he criticized excesses. Not uncommon among the Woke.
He tried to adjust the strategy based on his observations.
The Cold War was not a conspiracy.
It’s the same exact conspiracy, but the Soviets were the puppet-masters beginning in the late 1910s and lasting until the end of the Cold War.
That’s why I don’t think you can give a clear answer as to who’s behind this conspiracy and people been asking you for like a year plus now.
Either the answer doesn’t exist or your answer is so socially unacceptable that you won’t say it even on an anonymous message forum.
I know who it is, but don’t worry, I won’t spoil it.
