lol. the left now….“ma’ rights!!!”
2 Likes
Yeah, umm,
even if the DOJ get’s its way on this there is >0 protection for suspects,
but I don’t think it is enough.
Convince at least one third party (in our system that means a judge) that search and/or apprehension is being done on good grounds . . . or don’t do it.
2 Likes
The search is to apprehend a named individual. Either that person is there, or he isn’t. What role would a judge play? In that regard, illegal aliens are detained every day without need for a warrant to detain them.
Within the context of the AEA, there is nothing in the act stating a judge has any role. It is an alien enemies act, designed to swiftly remove a real threat.
The role the judge plays is as a 3rd party monitor.
The “cops” think this search, or this apprehension id a good idea.
Can they convince at least one uninvolved 3rd party of that?
1 Like
We are talking about ICE apprehension of an illegal alien. It happens many times a day without a warrant. It always has.
Well, atleast individual rights are something to protect now…for the time being.
3 Likes
No real disagreement. The steps outlined in the DOJ memo have nothing to do with American citizens.
However, I do wonder if an American citizen might be arrested for knowingly harboring an individual targeted within the context of the DOJ memo.
Don’t be accused of being in a foreign terrorist gang and you’ll be good.
1 Like
No need to wonder anymore.
I am picturing an ICE cop saying
“I have really really good reason to think this guy is here illegally . . . only, no one outside my immediate circle of friends will believe it.”
1 Like
First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a socialist.
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a trade unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me
2 Likes
I was thinking of the two judges when I made the comment. 
I’m not sure what you are saying.
Not remotely relevant to terrorism. LIBs believe terrorism is much to do about nothing. Thank God Trump is taking it seriously.
The democrats already passed laws in their blue states that allow cops to kick in my door and steal my property. If I try to stop them, they are allowed to shoot me. Remember those red flag laws that all you democrats pushed,
1 Like
The red flag laws democrats passed already allow them to come to your home, kick in the door and take your property without a warrant.
2 Likes
As far as I’m concerned, the Trump administartion can arrest an deport every illegal in this country…so long as two requirements are met.
-
Deportees are given a chance for their case to be reviewed (due process). This doesn’t necessarily mean a full blown judicial review.
-
No rights are violated ie…no illegal search and seizure.
Meet those requirements and you can boot’em all as far as I’m concerned.
1 Like
I am saying if they have a good reason to enter someone’s home
(someone who might just be a Puerto Rican whom they thought was a Dominican) then they should be able to convince a third party of that.
If they cannot convince a third party of that then probably their judgment is clouded and they should not doit.
1 Like
You already gave away our rights with your passing of red flag laws. You haven’t clutch your pearls when cops kick in the door of some innocent citizen without a warrant. Take his property and when he tries to stop them, they shoot him. Hypocrite.
1 Like
There are various classes of deportees, each with different handling procedures. With the DOJ memo, we are talking only about Tren de Aragua terrorists. Other than the required Habeas Corpus relief mandated by SCOTUS, there is no AEA requirement for any review.
