Keep declining permits that don’t supply a “valid” reason.
Keep declining permits that don’t supply a “valid” reason.
Then someone whose permit was declined will sue in state court, and win.
Steel-W0LF:Keep declining permits that don’t supply a “valid” reason.
Then someone whose permit was declined will sue in state court, and win.
Wouldn’t that be along the lines of a writ of mandamus?
WW
AGs, Mayors
Steel-W0LF:Keep declining permits that don’t supply a “valid” reason.
Then someone whose permit was declined will sue in state court, and win.
Ok. But that’s my point. What enforcement is there?
So they win in court…… the state still doesn’t grant the permit…. What then?
Ok. But that’s my point. What enforcement is there?
So they win in court…… the state still doesn’t grant the permit…. What then?
Then they carry their weapon anyway.
Individuals can pursue Writs of Mandamus in the Federal Courts to compel State officials to comply with the ruling and in the extreme, can seek contempt orders which could go up to and include the Governor, Attorney General and other positions and could potentially include jail.
Individuals can pursue Writs of Mandamus in the Federal Courts to compel State officials to comply with the ruling and in the extreme, can seek contempt orders which could go up to and include the Governor, Attorney General and other positions and could potentially include jail.
Thanks. That’s more what I was looking for.
Basically: What prevents a state from going “so what, we don’t care what the court says.”
Oooo I saw what you did there and approve wholeheartedly!
WuWei:The prog hoplophobes are really upset.
Democrats raise alarm after Supreme Court strikes NY concealed carry law | Fox News
“Well, the NRA just got what they paid for with all the dark money that they spent on packing the court,” Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., told Fox News.
Idiot.
Should we do away with the first amendment too? Kamala told us all how dangerous that is.
But she is now in charge of making sure the peasants can’t say anything bad about the political elites and their buddies so it’s all good.
The fact that 3 justices support special privileges is extremely concerning for me.
“unbiased” my shockingly caucasian ass.
Safiel:Individuals can pursue Writs of Mandamus in the Federal Courts to compel State officials to comply with the ruling and in the extreme, can seek contempt orders which could go up to and include the Governor, Attorney General and other positions and could potentially include jail.
Thanks. That’s more what I was looking for.
Basically: What prevents a state from going “so what, we don’t care what the court says.”
That sounds like what the NY Governor is saying in so many words.
what a complete crock of ■■■■ pulled from your imagination.
Then they carry their weapon anyway.
Now that’s a risky proposition.
what a complete crock of ■■■■ pulled from your imagination.
Be nice. He’s english. He’s never seen a gun.
Now that’s a risky proposition.
Well, of course.
But either way, that’ll be the world we live in.
WuWei:Now that’s a risky proposition.
Well, of course.
But either way, that’ll be the world we live in.
California and Hawaii have been in contempt for years.
red flag laws i believe would fit into the “affray” exceptions noted at the time of ratification. also the bond requirements for those who had demonstrated they could not act responsibly with the right.
this is sad, someone should tell doj once the court has made its decision, they don’t get a vote, they just enforce.
The prog hoplophobes are really upset.
Democrats raise alarm after Supreme Court strikes NY concealed carry law | Fox News
“Well, the NRA just got what they paid for with all the dark money that they spent on packing the court,” Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., told Fox News.
Idiot.
Nothing from Hawaii?