Did Hillary Sell Access to "Foreign Actors"

[Cratic3947]

@AlwaysRight

Hello all. Some may remember me. Most of you probably have no clue who I am. However, “Hello to you all.”

Question coming out of the IG report and I would like answered:

The IG report states “Foreign Actors” obtained access to Hillary’s emails. It does not, to my knowledge, claim it was hacked.

1. Did Clinton sell access to her server? We need to know.
2. IF it was hacked, was the purpose of the email server in the basement in defiance of protocol, to make hacking easy and less likely to be detected - in return for payment to access? We need to know.

So, we were right. Dems were fooled as usual…

[Hellsbane]

WHERE IS JEFF SESSIONS, the world wonders!!!

[Hellsbane]

No it does not. Read a few post up the line and it is spelled out. Negligence alone, intent be damned, will get a conviction.

[lulubee]

@Hellsbane

WHERE IS JEFF SESSIONS, the world wonders!!!

I think he’s in his office, working.

Now, why hasn’t he, the Trump appointed AG, prosecuted Hillary?

Didn’t Trump hire only the best people?

[Hellsbane]

@WildRose

© Whoever, for the purpose aforesaid, receives or obtains or agrees or attempts to receive or obtain from any person, or from any source whatever, any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note, of anything connected with the national defense, knowing or having reason to believe, at the time he receives or obtains, or agrees or attempts to receive or obtain it, that it has been or will be obtained, taken, made, or disposed of by any person contrary to the provisions of this chapter; or
(d) Whoever, lawfully having possession of, access to, control over, or being entrusted with any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it on demand to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it; or
(e) Whoever having unauthorized possession of, access to, or control over any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted, or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it; or
(f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

(g) If two or more persons conspire to violate any of the foregoing provisions of this section, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each of the parties to such conspiracy shall be subject to the punishment provided for the offense which is the object of such conspiracy.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/793

When it comes to intent however.

She also refused to comply with subpoenas for her emails.

She also then had her staff wipe the hard drives and destroy the devices while her emails were under subpoena.

Bingo. Destruction of evidence provides intent.

[adroit]

@Hellsbane

No it does not. Read a few post up the line and it is spelled out. Negligence alone, intent be damned, will get a conviction.

I have no doubt you are immensely more qualified to weigh in compared to the several attorneys that assessed all of the evidence in light of all legal precedent and determined there was no violation of the law.

[dantes]

Gross negligence.

Do you know how gross negligence is defined? The FBI and DoJ do.

[toreyj01]

From my understanding of timelines she ordered the server wiped months before the request for that information came to her. And, from what I recall, she did preserve all information she thought was germane to her job as SoS and submitted it beforehand.

From what I recall, she only deleted personal emails, at least that is what she said in her testimony to congress.

I think the IG report sort of confirms that.

[Hellsbane]

I know Trump said, AFTER the election, that he did not want to go after Hillery, Sessions could be operating under that instruction. I, on the other hand, believe they should go after her, charge her, and prosecute vigorously. This is the second a Clinton was given a pass. First time Bill was given a pass by Bush. This time Hillery was given a pass by Trump.

[Hellsbane]

There are quite a few people sitting in prison who know what gross negligence in handling classified information means.

[dantes]

Name one please. Let’s see what their case tells us and how it compares.

[Hellsbane]

Well, how do you know that ONLY personal, crap, e-mails were deleted? Well, we know. E-mails she deleted also included e-mails containing classified information. Those were found/recovered through other means. Also, NO e-mails on that server were supposed to be deleted. She used it for Government purposes so everything on it was government property.

[lulubee]

@Hellsbane

I know Trump said, AFTER the election, that he did not want to go after Hillery, Sessions could be operating under that instruction. I, on the other hand, believe they should go after her, charge her, and prosecute vigorously. This is the second a Clinton was given a pass. First time Bill was given a pass by Bush. This time Hillery was given a pass by Trump.

IOW, you got conned into believing ■■■■ Trump said on the campaign trail.

“Lock Her Up”
“Lock Her Up
“Lock Her Up”

Has a nice ring to it, no?

[Hellsbane]

AFTER, AFTER, AFTER! Geez guy, can’t you even read.

[lulubee]

@Hellsbane

AFTER, AFTER, AFTER! Geez guy, can’t you even read.

You got conned by the ■■■■ Trump said on the campaign trail.

Just admit it - you’ll feel better

[Keyser_Soze]

And here is what the Nothing- has produced to date:

Seth Abramson

[GrandWazoo]

It was Bruce Lee. He is the only foreign actor I can think of.

[adroit]

@Hellsbane

Well, how do you know that ONLY personal, crap, e-mails were deleted? Well, we know. E-mails she deleted also included e-mails containing classified information. Those were found/recovered through other means. Also, NO e-mails on that server were supposed to be deleted. She used it for Government purposes so everything on it was government property.

If only the federal prosecutors had your expertise.

[conan]

LOL that made me laugh.

Good job.

[Drawz]

@AlwaysRight

Always a “conspiracy” where the Clinton’s are concerned (even with gun in hand) but President Trump’s involved in a Russian conspiracy though no evidence has yet to be presented after 2 years…

As an independent conservative (by no means a member of the corrupt GOP) I want the truth no matter who gets thrown under the bus. This is not a political issue. This is a judicial issue and the fact that a deep state does appear to exist and it attempted to turn an election and then overthrow an election when they couldn’t control the outcome.

A deep state attempted to overthrow an election? What are you referring to, specifically?