Um, I hate to tell you this, but you have no idea what you’re talking about. If there is probable cause that a crime was committed, someone gets arrested. There is no requirement for “probable cause” in order to initiate an investigation.
It isn’t just “some anonymous lady”…it’s people who analyze the data looking for suspicious cash transaction patterns.
It’s an institution that has been under fire for allowing this very type of activity, so even though the officials at the bank said “Don’t investigate”, said officials do not have a pattern of being trustworthy.
It’s that in the past decade or so, Trump has gone from being “The King of Debt” to being a mostly cash transaction business person, which anyone who knows anything about “high finance” knows is NOT a good sign.
It’s a guy who, along with his family, has a history of shady dealing.
There is more than enough smoke here to just lightly dismiss it as “some anonymous lady saying something”.
And I warned you precisely of this before the election, only to be told “Nah …we’ve had rich presidents before”.
I’m sorry you still haven’t figured the con man out. There’s millions more like you so you shouldn’t feel too bad. Hell, it took the banks years to figure him out.