Putting LIBS back in their place.
You’re using sexual freaks to undermined everything that is normal in society and our republic.
Same way libs uses other minorities. To advance your authoritarian state.
Putting LIBS back in their place.
You’re using sexual freaks to undermined everything that is normal in society and our republic.
Same way libs uses other minorities. To advance your authoritarian state.
You are supporting a law that tells people what they can and can not talk about and you are accusing others of being authoritarian…
Lol.
Also, I bet you have some gay relatives.
And yet libs have no idea how they’re using systemic and structural racism to advance their agenda…or maybe they do.
We are supporting a law that prohibits the state from advancing their corrupted state agenda.
How is it authoritarian when you’re preventing the state…and yes teachers union is the state.
Only a lib would think prevent the state/government as authoritarian.
You are using the power of the state to prevent teachers talking about members of American society.
Hooray for small government!
Its no different than say a law forbidden the teaching of a book.
False and absurd.
Teacher are the state…libs did that. Now we are preventing the state from indoctrination kids to become state controlled. And only a lib like yourself would claim preventing authorities from carrying out their state agenda as authoritarian.
Nice try lib. American people see lies and deception you’re doing.
Tell me libs. Maybe this should have a thread of it’s own.
Is the Bill of Rights authoritarian?
The state is the divine idea as it exists on earth. The state will be perfected. …the individual, whose supreme duty is to be a member of the state.
Hegel
So I am sure you would be fine with the KKK leading a class of the benefits of White Supremacy. Correct? You wouldn’t want the power of the State preventing it.
Even then it’s not same…KKK isn’t the state as our schools have become. That and teachers union are tools of state as well.
Only a lib would think stopping them from using the state power as authoritarian.
So I’ll ask libs again. Is BoR’s authoritarianism?
No I am talking about using the state to prevent a school from teaching the benefits of White Supremacy. My guess he is fine with it then.
Ah, I see. You’re correct.
So I am sure you would be fine with the KKK leading a class of the benefits of White Supremacy. Correct? You wouldn’t want the power of the State preventing it.
You don’t see a difference between showing support for LGBTQ with a rainbow bracelet, and promoting racism?
Ok…
No I am talking about using the state to prevent a school from teaching the benefits of White Supremacy. My guess he is fine with it then.
Wouldn’t MOST people want the state to prevent the state from teaching the benefits of white supremacy?
You are saying it as if there would be a strong opposition to that.
Now we are preventing the state from indoctrination kids to become state controlled.
L o l
What does this even mean? Are they “state controlled” when they are taught science? Or they are only “state controlled” when they are taught that gay and transgender exist?
“Exist”
Motte?
“Exist”
Motte?
Teachers can’t “discuss” it until 9th grade. Read the law.
“Exist”
Motte?
Example… from Florida. (Not Ohio)
Following the enactment of what critics call the “Don’t Say Gay” law, some LGBTQ teachers have quit the profession altogether.
Last month, a group of parents in Orlando, Florida, demanded “consequences” against sixth grade science teacher Robert Thollander. His crime? Thollander acknowledged his marriage at school.
“He married a man. This alone is not an issue. Sharing the details … with all his 6th grade students is the issue,” the parents wrote in a letter sent to their children’s school board, which was shared with NBC News. “It was not appropriate. Many of these students felt very uncomfortable with the conversations and shared this with their families.”
Had Thollander just “said he will be out for a few days because he was getting married, no problem,” the letter continued, “but to discuss the details and create an uncomfortable situation for the students with no benefit to teaching his subject matter is inappropriate.”
Now, if he had said he is marrying his girlfriend… nobody would have blinked twice. However because he mentioned he was marrying a man… now these parents have a problem.
Why should he have to hide who he is marrying when other teacher don’t?
You don’t see a difference between supporting sexual deviancy and child perversion to racism?