How do those in power live in a place like Norway?
Never said that, nor do I believe that.
Why make crap up?
Pretty much like most other people in Norway, without ostentatious displays of wealth.
And no one is taxed half to death.
I’m not. That’s the end result of what the left wants, whether they realize it or not
Pretty much like most other people in Norway, without ostentatious displays of wealth.
And no one is taxed half to death.
Yes, taxes are insanely high there, but, I’m sure not to you…Pfffffffffffffffffffffffft!
I’m not. That’s the end result of what the left wants, whether they realize it or not
Nope, Seriously…no.
I understand the need to try to make those claims…but you are wrong…very wrong.
Yes, taxes are insanely high there, but, I’m sure not to you
Taxes are higher…but not as much as you claim. there are many expenses, that are covered with the expanded social services, so it makes up for it.
And the good news, if one does not make a lot of money, they are still able to access the basics, including healthcare.
NJBob:Pretty much like most other people in Norway, without ostentatious displays of wealth.
And no one is taxed half to death.
Yes, taxes are insanely high there, but, I’m sure not to you…Pfffffffffffffffffffffffft!
You sure?
Not only is the top marginal tax rate lower in Norway, life expectancy is significantly longer.
And the people are happier.
Ceasar:I’m not. That’s the end result of what the left wants, whether they realize it or not
Nope, Seriously…no.
I understand the need to try to make those claims…but you are wrong…very wrong.
Ceasar: NJBob:Pretty much like most other people in Norway, without ostentatious displays of wealth.
And no one is taxed half to death.
Yes, taxes are insanely high there, but, I’m sure not to you…Pfffffffffffffffffffffffft!
You sure?
Not only is the top marginal tax rate lower in Norway, life expectancy is significantly longer.
And the people are happier.
Ceasar:Yes, taxes are insanely high there, but, I’m sure not to you
Taxes are higher…but not as much as you claim. there are many expenses, that are covered with the expanded social services, so it makes up for it.
And the good news, if one does not make a lot of money, they are still able to access the basics, including healthcare.
NJBob: Ceasar: NJBob:Pretty much like most other people in Norway, without ostentatious displays of wealth.
And no one is taxed half to death.
Yes, taxes are insanely high there, but, I’m sure not to you…Pfffffffffffffffffffffffft!
You sure?
Not only is the top marginal tax rate lower in Norway, life expectancy is significantly longer.
And the people are happier.
Glad you think that’s funny.
Oh, BTW capitol gains taxes are also lower in Norway. And people in Norway don’t need to buy health insurance, that can easily run over $15,000 a year for a family here.
Ceasar: NJBob: Ceasar: NJBob:Pretty much like most other people in Norway, without ostentatious displays of wealth.
And no one is taxed half to death.
Yes, taxes are insanely high there, but, I’m sure not to you…Pfffffffffffffffffffffffft!
You sure?
Not only is the top marginal tax rate lower in Norway, life expectancy is significantly longer.
And the people are happier.
Glad you think that’s funny.
Oh, BTW capitol gains taxes are also lower in Norway. And people in Norway don’t need to buy health insurance, that can easily run over $15,000 a year for a family here.
Not only is the top marginal tax rate lower in Norway, life expectancy is significantly longer.
And the people are happier.
That’s because they eat and behave healthier, not because they pay more taxes. Perhaps if they weren’t taxed so much, they could afford to eat more junk food and lay about playing video games and social networking like us.
NJBob:Finland has significantly reduced homelessness and it on its way towards eliminating it altogether.
What percent of their population was homeless prior to the programs they introduced? Also, what were the reasons for the homelessness there? There’s no guarantee what they did there will have the same success here. This was the anecdotal account I found in another forum:
“I once volunteered at the San Francisco Rescue Mission for several months. We had a program that would give the homeless a “job” with the mission, food, clothing and a place to live. Eventually the program would get them on government assistance, into government housing, with a guaranteed real job at participating businesses. We had funding and space for a hundred “beds” in this program at the time. You know how many people we had take advantage of it while I was there? Four, and two washed out. The homeless just did not want help getting out of their predicament, no matter how much money we had to help them.”
I’ve read other anecdotal accounts like this as well over the years.
Something the Norway is paradise crowd never mentions is that when you compare how well people from Norway do here to how well the people in Norway are doing the ones living here are doing much better, economically and life span wise. They always compare them to Americans in general because an apples to apples comparison shows that the people from Nordic countries who live here also do far better than the average American.
Why can’t it? Explain please.
The fact that it needs explanation means you wouldn’t understand.
More likely you can’t explain. That’s OK, don’t worry.
Never said Norway is paradise, my point all along is/has been we could learn something from Nordic countries if only we were willing.
That’s fine.
But the data sets are different. You have to account for two very different societies.
Norway is pretty homogenous. The US is basically 11 different nations pushed together under one form of government.
The things that work very well there may not work as well here. You have to account for that.
No argument, but that shouldn’t be an excuse to maintain our current, less than optimal, status quo.
For example, a national healthcare plan can work here. In fact it already does for those over 65.