1 Like
Well, you have not proven you assertion is a fact. Just another RW talking point.
1 Like
1 Like
No, it has not.
Multiple memes will not change THAT fact.
It is an opinion, based onâŚwell, not much.
1 Like
You should be ashamed of yourself.
1 Like
I will never be ashamed of not buying into low info conspiracy theories.
Not opinionâŚitâs a fact. And lying about it doesnât help your cause.
1 Like
Great.
You can add it to the curriculum right after Flat Earth and Creationism.
If your response is: what business do politicized unproven theories have in educationâŚ. Bingo. Thatâs why CRT and all this new genders stuff doesnât belong as well.
FBIâŚtwittwerâŚelectionâŚhello!!
Poorly lying and defending.
2 Likes
Itâs not a problem, itâs a feature:
Liberating tolerance, then, would mean intolerance against movements from the Right and toleration of movements from the Left. As to the scope of this tolerance and intolerance: ⌠it would extend to the stage of action as well as of discussion and propaganda, of deed as well as of word. The traditional criterion of clear and present danger seems no longer adequate to a stage where the whole society is in the situation of the theater audience when somebody cries: âfireâ. It is a situation in which the total catastrophe could be triggered off any moment, not only by a technical error, but also by a rational miscalculation of risks, or by a rash speech of one of the leaders. In past and different circumstances, the speeches of the Fascist and Nazi leaders were the immediate prologue to the massacre. The distance between the propaganda and the action, between the organization and its release on the people had become too short. But the spreading of the word could have been stopped before it was too late: if democratic tolerance had been withdrawn when the future leaders started their campaign, mankind would have had a chance of avoiding Auschwitz and a World War.
Emphasis mine
2 Likes
I find this kind of interesting. To become what you hate. Or more precisely to become what you want to avoid.
It is what we are witnessing now IMO.
1 Like
From link above.
The whole post-fascist period is one of clear and present danger. Consequently, true pacification requires the withdrawal of tolerance before the deed, at the stage of communication in word, print, and picture. Such extreme suspension of the right of free speech and free assembly is indeed justified only if the whole of society is in extreme danger. I maintain that our society is in such an emergency situation, and that it has become the normal state of affairs. Different opinions and âphilosophiesâ can no longer compete peacefully for adherence and persuasion on rational grounds: the âmarketplace of ideasâ is organized and delimited by those who determine the national and the individual interest. In this society, for which the ideologists have proclaimed the âend of ideologyâ, the false consciousness has become the general consciousnessâfrom the government down to its last objects.
2 Likes
The hidden threat of fascism justifies it all.
1 Like
Therefor they become fascist.
2 Likes
Exactly.
LibsâŚyouâre going to sit here and tell me YOU donât have censorship problem?
Democrat senator Mark Kelly wanted to know Federal Reserve, Treasury Department, and the Federal Deposit Insurance (FDIC) if they had a way to censor information on social media to prevent a run on the banks,
As I saidâŚdemocrats have a censorship problem. Every time a problem comes up libs want to censor it so we the People wonât know.
As I said decade and half agoâŚlibs (fake liberals) believe in censorship.
5 Likes
So he was the one Massie didnât name? Doesnât surprise me. Kelly is an absolute â â â â â â â â
2 Likes
More proof that democrats donât believe in free speechâŚbut do believe in censorship.
The US House of Representatives, controlled by the GOP, has passed the Protecting Speech from Government Interference Act, which seeks to prohibit federal bureaucrats from using their influence to censor speech or pressure social media companies to censor speech. The bill passed on a 219-206 vote, breaking along party lines, and is unlikely to advance in the Democratic-controlled US Senate.
Thanks @zantax for bring this to my attention.
5 Likes
Surely all of this boards âliberalsâ will be along shortly to condemn Democrats for this vote.
4 Likes
