So we would need to get 3.2 trillion a year in new revenue to the fed gov. And that’s if the projections are correct, which they never are. That’s a lot of taxes.
No, that’s not 3.2 trillion in new revenue. That’s the total annual cost of health care expenditures. The current annual health care expenditures is $3.5T. If we can afford the latter, we can certainly afford the former (you know, because it’s less. Math FTW).
No it’s not. Because the only thing that matters when assessing the cost of health care is the aggregate cost of all health care expenditures on a per capita basis. We spend about $10,700 per capita on health care expenditures. Completely eliminating liability insurance would bring that down a whopping $21. Liability insurance isn’t even a drop in the bucket.
While this has also been proven false, I’ll entertain it and simply highlight that you ignore the fact that someone without insurance has the longest wait of all… NEVER.
well to begin with the medicaid needs to be sweeten so that states that have previously rejected expansion can be enticed to expand. Not sure how to do it but it needs to get done.
Tens of thousands of people die prematurely a year as a result of no insurance coverage. But Canadians have to wait longer for elective surgeries than those with insurance in the US, so those Canucks have it worse.
This is how desperate the right is. They’re asking dems for ideas on healthcare. I suspect this thread is going to a committee somewhere tasked with writing Trump’s healthcare plan.