They had reason to suspect people in Trump’s campaign were working with the Russians. They had no reason to suspect people in Clinton’s campaign were working with the Russians.
Is that simple enough or do we need to knock it down a few more grade levels?
Wow, the way you choose to remain ignorant is amazing.
From the article, and countless others reporting on this that you could easily find and inform yourself if you chose to:
The email was a phishing scam that ultimately revealed Podesta’s password to hackers. Soon after, WikiLeaks began releasing 10 years of his emails.
In late October the firm SecureWorks identified a Bit.ly account and WikiLeaks-released email that appeared to have been used to attack Podesta’s account.
The Bit.ly service shortens web addresses, which can make them easier to share — and less likely to set off malicious website alarms.
SecureWorks found a Bit.ly account being used by hackers containing links to a spate of phishing sites with victim information encoded in the web address.
SecureWorks soon found the email, and Delavan’s response, in the WikiLeaks archive.
“But the FBI started to look into Trump’s ties to Russia in the summer of 2016. Trump tweeted that this spring – this spying, rather, this spying that he claims is spying, other people say it’s a whistleblower or informant. He says it’s spying, it’s bigger than Watergate. So I ask you, was the FBI spying on Trump’s campaign?” Co-host Joy Behar asked.
“No, they were not,” Clapper answered. “They were spying on, a term I don’t particularly like, but on what the Russians were doing. Trying to understand were the Russians infiltrating, trying to gain access, trying to gain leverage or influence which is what they do.”