Oh, but in sense, they are. Your previous post seemingly made the argument that doctors would be okay with this anyway, as their real business is helping people. That bit sounds good on the surface, but crumbles upon first inspection. If that’s truly the case, why do we have this current problem, then? Shouldn’t they be giving away their services now? What are they waiting for? The government to force them into it?
Because the poor are incapable of helping themselves, you call for others to help them through force of government. And hey, that’s fine. But it still is a part of the morality discussion even thought you really don’t want it be. At least you conceded that doctors aren’t in just to help people.
I don’t want a GoFundMe nation for healthcare. As we have now.
I’m cool with you and others talking about the morality of free universal healthcare being wrong because for some reason that will make doctors slaves. No one buys that ■■■■■
Y’all, if we provide universal coverage, then doctors are pretty much slaves. Because they can’t choose to not work or do something else, or something.
Such a stupid argument. I know, because I used to hold that position when I was a ridiculous libertarian and actually made the ■■■■■■■■■ rights argument.
Force? Hmm, I don’t know. But if I’m understanding the current problem correctly, it’s that people don’t get the care they need due to cost. One proposed solution is government giving the right to that care to everyone. So my question is, how does the government compel people to do things they aren’t already doing?
Buddy, you are swinging at windmills. You can be a conservative who supports universal healthcare. Last poll I checked the majority of republicans supported it.