Dark days ahead for the good ship USA

[biggestal99]

@Samm

You’re behind the times. He’s up to 28 now. Well as of 2 days ago that is. That’s two a day. He’ll have Trump beat by June.

Talk to me when he hits 100.

Allan

[Jezcoe]

@Samm

@Jezcoe

@Smyrna

@biggestal99

Trump made his own bed touting cures and his Pollyanna approach to the situation.

Are you in denial of the truth, that the hydroxychloroquine cocktail…if it had been immediately used…and applied early in the COVID infection of a patient, potentially thousands and thousands and thousands and thousands of lives would have been saved? Now consider the media, the political establishment and all of those who vehemently fought against it’s use…only because Trump touted it? They are complicit and have blood on their hands. Do you hold them accountable or are you in denial?

Hydroxychloroquine: Does it Have Clinical Value in COVID-19? A Point, Counterpoint Discussion | American Council on Science and Health

That is an interesting point/counterpoint article. Thank you for that.

One thing that stuck out to me about the point of using HCQ was this “ The reduced risk was even more significant when only those in one study who started HCQ within two days of exposure were included. ”

Which to me means that in order for HCQ to be effective for treatment it would have to be administered within a certain time frame after exposure and therefore would have to have been paired with a robust testing and tracing regimen.

But also… it was only one study that showed this effect and that has to be stacked up against all of the other studies that show little to no effect.

So it seems that even if this one study was right… and it could very well be right… in order to get the most effectiveness out of using HCQ as a treatment, new infections would have to be caught early and in order to catch it early the nation would have had to do massive testing and tracing program that there was no real political will to do. Basically… it would have taken hard work and we don’t do that.

So how many days was Trump sick with COVID-19 after first testing positive?

Do you suppose there may have been a direct correlation between his prior use off HCQ and the severity of his infection?

Even if Trump took HCQ … I don’t believe that he did… the timeline from him making the claim and him actually catching Covid does not make sense.

[gooddad409]

@Smyrna

@sikofit

What could go wrong? Other than a half million dead Americans that is.

More died from governors placing elderly patients already infected with the China virus into uninfected nursing homes, than from Christians going to church. Now…get your disdain in order and place it where it should rightfully go…can you?

Cuomo should be jailed for what he did. And now it turns out he under reported the nursing home deaths by 50 percent as well.

[Samm]

@biggestal99

@Samm

You’re behind the times. He’s up to 28 now. Well as of 2 days ago that is. That’s two a day. He’ll have Trump beat by June.

Talk to me when he hits 100.

Allan

Oh, ye of little faith.

[Samm]

@Jezcoe

@Samm

@Jezcoe

@Smyrna

@biggestal99

Trump made his own bed touting cures and his Pollyanna approach to the situation.

Are you in denial of the truth, that the hydroxychloroquine cocktail…if it had been immediately used…and applied early in the COVID infection of a patient, potentially thousands and thousands and thousands and thousands of lives would have been saved? Now consider the media, the political establishment and all of those who vehemently fought against it’s use…only because Trump touted it? They are complicit and have blood on their hands. Do you hold them accountable or are you in denial?

Hydroxychloroquine: Does it Have Clinical Value in COVID-19? A Point, Counterpoint Discussion | American Council on Science and Health

That is an interesting point/counterpoint article. Thank you for that.

One thing that stuck out to me about the point of using HCQ was this “ The reduced risk was even more significant when only those in one study who started HCQ within two days of exposure were included. ”

Which to me means that in order for HCQ to be effective for treatment it would have to be administered within a certain time frame after exposure and therefore would have to have been paired with a robust testing and tracing regimen.

But also… it was only one study that showed this effect and that has to be stacked up against all of the other studies that show little to no effect.

So it seems that even if this one study was right… and it could very well be right… in order to get the most effectiveness out of using HCQ as a treatment, new infections would have to be caught early and in order to catch it early the nation would have had to do massive testing and tracing program that there was no real political will to do. Basically… it would have taken hard work and we don’t do that.

So how many days was Trump sick with COVID-19 after first testing positive?

Do you suppose there may have been a direct correlation between his prior use off HCQ and the severity of his infection?

Even if Trump took HCQ … I don’t believe that he did… the timeline from him making the claim and him actually catching Covid does not make sense.

That makes no sense at all. People catch COVID when they are exposed, not when they take something to try to build resistance to it.