Couple is freed from ICE by federal judge while say they are not gang members

Politics
1

you wanted a case where people are declared non gang members and here is is

“A Venezuelan couple detained in El Paso for nine days was released Friday night, after a federal judge ruled that Immigration and Customs Enforcement had failed to prove they are “alien enemies” or members of the Tren de Aragua gang.

In a scathing ruling, U.S. District Judge David Briones of El Paso said the government “has not demonstrated they have any lawful basis to continue detaining” the couple who have been held at El Paso Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention center as alien enemies since April 16.”

no deportation of them as they have been freed.

It a great day for the illegally detained immigrants.

american courts actually work sometimes.

Allan

2

and more for one of esteemed posters.

an order for release, known as a writ of habeas corpus, would usually bring swift compliance.

so they fired for habeas, challenged their removal from the country
and proved their case.

  1. they are not gang members

  2. they will not be deported

  3. they are free.

challenged their removal under AEA and lets see.

WON.

Allan

3

Is that the habanero thing? What’s it called? Havana…

Ah Habeas Corpus?

2 Likes
4

They can still be deported. In June.

5

sure. but not under AEA.

Allan

1 Like
6

Now you found a better example than Kilmar.

Those poor Fed judges ARE working so hard these days.

:rofl:

3 Likes
7

govt flimsy evidence doesnt hold up to the light of the day.

Allan

8

Good to know they won’t be committing any more crimes before their free plane ride back to Venezuela. We can wait till June. Gives you Libs time to send Farewell and sympathy cards…

7 Likes
9

That is why you check first admit second.

1 Like
10

The sooner they stop buying eggs and taking up space, the better.

6 Likes
11

No, this is a reaction to Kilmer.

12

They are part of the flood of illegals on temporary parole. What good does releasing them do but delay their return?
It gets me they keep referring to the AEA as the 18th century law, but they then claim they should be released under an 18th century constitution.

3 Likes
13

They’re just hoping they can stall Trump enough to come up with another plan to stop his agenda entirely. They don’t give a crap about these illegals or America, their hatred of Trump overrides any other thought in their empty Lib heads…

4 Likes
14

why trump keep on appealing in court once he was found liable.

stall. stall. stall. trying to run the clock out.

Allan

15

Interesting that we have a clear example of the government holding someone they had no evidence was part of a gang, and yet several posters are still subtly accusing the person as someone who “committed crimes” and seem to be more angry at the judge for letting him go than the government who was yet again trying to imprison someone despite having no evidence of guilt.

Interesting indeed…

16

Worst of the worst.

17

guilt is not a factor in a status case. Neither is innocence. I don’t know if it will be appealed or if a higher court will correct the error. Applying the criminal standards of proof in a status review is not correct. No crime is involved. It is not up to the government to “prove” the status, it is up to the petitioner to prove the government is wrong. Did they? Maybe they did. If so, good for them, now they can be detained as illegal aliens (not under AEA) until their asylum hearing.

18

they are free (for now)

Allan

19

and under the law illegal aliens MUST be detained until thier asylum hearing, stay in a 3rd country or be paroled pending the hearing. The judge ruled they could not be deported under AEA (wrongly) applying criminal standards of proof in a status review.

20

i guess perhaps you are wrong on this. the couple was freed by the judge. they are on parole status and are asylum seekers.

Allan