No. The last one was in my favor and it wasn’t 20 years ago.
Wouldn’t be any different than research into drunk driving.
1 Like
Don’t gun lovers always compare gun deaths to car deaths? Government studies and keeps statistics on speed limits, driving conditions, seat belts, car seats, and vehicle safety.
Yeah, I think they do.
1 Like
I could tell you why…
1 Like
I haven’t seen a single lib mention why the restriction was necessary in the first place.
Studying gun violence is operative research on a political group?
1 Like
If you guys want to study it do so using your own money.
Would you libs have a problem if republican congress wants to fund study on why woman have abortions?
Would that be cool with you all?
1 Like
Let me check with the hive mind since anyone against Trump thinks exactly the same as the next critic of him. Would that be cool with you all?
1 Like
Seriously though - studying gun violence is conducting research against a political group?
What group?
1 Like
Americans
2 Likes
Thank you for answering.
Will you please elaborate - how are Americans targeted from a study about gun violence? Is it only studies about gun violence that are taxpayer funded that do this targeting, or any study about it whatsoever?
1 Like
OK, then that would be a waste of time and money.
Are you denying that this is opposition researcher?
I made no mention of it either way.
Have you answered my very general question?
Mine second. Why was the restriction on government-funded studies put into place?
I don’t know - why?
I distrust any study sought primarily by one political side – either side. The goal is almost always intended to reach a particular finding. And you can bet that no matter what’s in the final report, the sponsoring side will draw its own conclusions.
2 Likes
CDC got caught in the cookie jar. It’s not hard to find.
Abortion is public health crisis…we need to fund why there are so many abortions.
3 Likes
