I heard a report on the radio that a letter to his superiors somehow made it to the press, suggesting he did go up the chain of command. Maybe he leaked it maybe not, it’s all just speculation.
The fact he was dismissed makes it appear that someone thinks he is responsible for the leak. Either that or there is some funny business going on at very high levels. Either one is possible in my opinion.
Felt it an inadequate response, something along the lines of “YOU’RE in command, act the part and make that ■■■■ work until we can implement a solution”.
His firs line supervisor was in the cabin next door. No contact.
He was on a video conference with theater command and never informed them.
There was good reason for the Tillman cover up, wrong as it was. There would have been an equal reason to cover this one up and try to just retire him quietly.
Apparently, having a gmail account with a mass mailing list and a will to let everyone and their brother know the boat you command is effectively a large paper weight, has a way of alleviating some of that burden.
Personally, I think he is a hero. I think he knew he would be relieved. I think he also knew that if he went up the chain of command the Navy’s gut response would be to cover it up.
I’m going with the theory he sacrificed his career for his crew.