Women’s wages are not keeping up with inflation.
I’ll say it again Women’s wages are not keeping up with inflation.
The difference is very small, (less than 1%) still, women’s wages are not keeping up with inflation.
CNN ran a story on Wednesday
“Millennial women are facing the first decline in well-being since the Silent Generation.”
Something called the Population Reference Bureau (PRB) a study/advocacy group has produced has apparently been publishing it “Population Reference Bulletin” for 77 years. It uses an index of economic well-being, health, crime safety etc. and has determined that for the first time since the silent generation (born between 1928 and 1945) a generation of American women are worse-off than their predecessors.
Interestingly, it was not necessary for the PRB to include things such as health and crime-safety to reach it’s conclusion.
On economic factors alone, working age women are worse-off this quarter than last quarter, and worse-off than they were pre-pandemic. Women’s wages are not keeping up with inflation.
I will add to that:
The percentage of women working two jobs (including two full-time jobs) is within a statistical wiggle of the all-time high (set last quarter).
Stocks ain’t the only thing going up in this economy.
Wow.
I spent some time last night over at the FRED website, generating random charts w/ demographic information. The results have been not-at-all what I expected.
CAVEAT:
In the past I have traditionally used income data, especially average income data. For reasons I don’t understand, to get info broken into demo graphic categories I need to switch my data set and use "weekly earnings-from-work** data and it is available sorted by median not average.
I am not sure that makes a lot of difference, but since some of the results are surprising, I thought I’d mention that caveat before posting the results here.
According to the CDC website, the shut-downs began March 15, 2020 (Trumps last year in office) so I use Jan 1 2020 as a reference point. Some “zoomed-in” results are below:
.
.
.
.