Cleveland Fed: New Tenant Rent Prices Plummet

The latest BLS and Cleveland Fed release of their quarterly new tenant rent index was lower by 2.43% year over year and over 5% from the prior quarter.

Unlike CPI shelter prices, which measure rental prices of all rental contracts . . . the new tenant rent index only measures recently signed rental agreements. . . . . Only approximately 5% of rents are renewed monthly. . . .

Seems inevitable.
Print a bunch of money.
Give it to the investment classes, some of that is going to be used to buy and build houses and apartments. (The supply shortage is a myth, The US currently has more homes per capita than at any tie in measured history.)

Yet if that money was given disproportianeyly to the investment classes and age groups (instead of the tenant classes and age groups) then demand will not keep up with the rapidly increasing supply.

Know the inflation rate in December was 0.4%. (It annualizes to almost 5% annually.)
Know that core inflation year-over-year was 2.9% in December. (almost 1 and half times higher than the target rate.)

Since shelter is nearly one-third of that,
and new rents are DOWN, not up . . .
What does that tell us about the price of everything else?

So is this just for Cleveland? Or is it a nationwide value?

Good question.

It is a nationwide number using pairs of observed rents for the same housing unit. Data provided by BLS.

Sometimes when an area Fed presents an index number that number applies only to their area (District). However in this case it is a nationwide number.

https://www.bls.gov/pir/new-tenant-rent.htm

Which, therefore, makes your question earlier more poignant.

1 Like

When these two lines touch
we are in a “normal” housing market (purchase price vs rent price.)

When the blue line is above the red line,

  • buying a home is a bad deal, in fact investors should consider selling
  • renting a home is a good deal. Tenants hosuld stay put.

.
.
.
Most of economics is predicated on “mean reversion” which suggests
"Those two lines touched for such a long time, the base case is that hey will touch again.
If someone thinks they will not touch again, the burden is on them to explain what changed to makes the new price-to-rent ratio permanent."

1 Like

Not a whole lotta homes selling right now.

Fewer than during the deep deep depths of the real estate crisis (even though our population has grown.)

Too high, and becoming out of reach.

1 Like

Or . . . the Fed created a bubble and we would have been better off with free market banking.
(Oh wait, that’s the same as what you said.)

edit: Didn’t realize how old this thread was!

Umm, this thread is 1 day old.
Perhaps you intended to post this elsewhere?

Wow… apparently I need more coffee. I saw the Jan 24 and assumed I stumbled upon an ancient thread. I can’t figure out why the timeline thingy says Jan 24…

But anyway, my point was that the CPI uses a longer rent history such that as rent prices fall, the CPI over-estimates inflation over the month. It does not use current month rental costs.

I believe that is correct.

CPI rent is based on a survey.
Contact a bunch of people and ask “how much are you paying for rent?”

Therefore
if “New Tenant Rent Prices Plummet” is a temporary blip it won’t have much impact on CPI rent.

if “New Tenant Rent Prices Plummet” is an extended thing, it will ahve an impact on CPI rent.

Either way the FEd way, way way overprinted a few yeras ago and everything else is just “What’s gonna happen because of it?” and “What should we do about it?”

Well … stop printing … might be a good start.

1 Like

The first post was made on Jan 24 (2025).

But yeah, I think you might be right and it used to be that recent threads had the full date at the ends of the timeline axis, and only old threads had MMM YY at the ends of the axis. But I could be wrong about that. I don’t pay a lot of attention to that axis and only look at the date displayed on the post itself.

image

Hahaha must be the coffee. I read that as January 2024 over and over and over.

1 Like

1 Like

I would love to see data on how long available properties are standing vacant. Vacancy duration has a big impact on asking price for rent.

I’ve seen data on both sides (some suggesting vacancy rates are high, and some suggesting vacancy rates are low.)

I suspect it varies by price ranges and target renter demographic.