So you weren’t addressing me?
SpacemanSpiff: WuWei: SpacemanSpiff: WuWei: zantax: mikee:Peddling it doesn’t make you free. But if you aren’t allowed to, you’re not as free as you could be.
Yeah well, you aren’t as free as you can be if you can’t eat corpses either, that doesn’t make doing it or legalizing it a good idea.
Damn dude! How do you go from whores to eating corpses in one move?
The same way you get from same sex marriage to legalized beastiality.
Quote where I ever said any such thing.
Not you, dude! But there were plenty of others.
So you weren’t addressing me?
Not at all. Sorry if it looked that way.
WuWei: SpacemanSpiff: WuWei: SpacemanSpiff: WuWei: zantax: mikee:Peddling it doesn’t make you free. But if you aren’t allowed to, you’re not as free as you could be.
Yeah well, you aren’t as free as you can be if you can’t eat corpses either, that doesn’t make doing it or legalizing it a good idea.
Damn dude! How do you go from whores to eating corpses in one move?
The same way you get from same sex marriage to legalized beastiality.
Quote where I ever said any such thing.
Not you, dude! But there were plenty of others.
So you weren’t addressing me?
Not at all. Sorry if it looked that way.
My apologies.
Would have to look at where this is already implemented. I dont quite think this will be a full on negative.
Canadian Court ruled a number of laws related to sex-work where unconstitutional today.
Quick question. Why have we changed the name from prostitution to sex work?
You’re right. It won’t be 100% negative.
Consider, if one can sell one’s access to the courts (i.e. a binding arbitration clause) and that is considered “freedom”…
You are very confused. That is not freedom because you will be compelled to go to arbitration if you change your mind and attempt to sue in court.