I largely agree with you here. If you want another perfect example more in my neck of the woods, look at Yellowstone. That was 30 years ago, hasn’t had the drought issue California has had, yet the forests there are still a tangled mess of dead fuel trees because some armchair quarterback thinks all fires are bad.
That whole park is going to burn to the ground sometime soon because people can’t grasp that forests NEED fires to stay healthy.
Trump is supposed to be a voice of reason and leadership during national tragedies. He has shown all of the grace and nuance of my idiot drunk father-in-law yelling at his television.
This kind of response to an ongoing disaster is completely horrible. Worst president ever.
He’s right. At the very LEAST they can build a series of fire breaks wide enough to stop fires from reaching towns. The environmental whackos won’t let hardly anything to be done. Better to just let it all burn down, right?
They probably don’t but if its government land they need to tell the town it’s for fire prevention & do it rather than what is happing over & over. Or do you have a better solution? I’m open to solutions rather than politics.
Sure. While someone’s house is still burning and their dead children have just been taken away is good time to tell the owner that is was their fault because they should have had another fire extinguisher in the house.