And in this case
RW kooks wanting ro kidnap and execute a sitting democratic governor.
See the trend.
Allan
TDS-LiB-1
1 Like
Is it tds for telling the truth.
The taliban did endorse trump.
You don’t like it but it is true.
Biden and democratic foreign policy would be tough on them.
Trump no so much. (Remember the called off meeting on 9/11)
Allan
So he aligns with your side in his hatred for Trump. That changes the narrative a bit.
anarchists… who are more in line with your antifa buddies.
They endorsed peace, the end of endless wars, a termination of 20 years of invasion; as do I. We have punished them enough for having bad house guests.
1 Like
This Michigan right wingers want to set up their own govt.
Complete with shams trials of government officials.
Allan
And why did we first invade Afghanistan?
With almost universal citizen approval.
Allan
They could call it CHOP or CHAZ.
3 Likes
Evidently even though these guys are smart, they weren’t as smart as the group in Portland.
At least in Portland they successfully took over a police station and several city blocks.
1 Like
“Liberate Michigan!”
Exactly. The funny part is that chop or chaz wasn’t created by anarchists. Thanks for supporting the posters exact point. Upon creation they immediately started setting up hierarchy and groups and leaders.
They didn’t successfully do anything In Portland.
Evidence of that is the current non existence of the aforementioned zones.
“get rid of trump”
you can keep trying to blame trump for these anarchist trump hating idiots all you like. His encouragement to law abiding citizens to liberate their state through peaceful protest from its despotic fascist governor was not a call to violence.
2 Likes
That’s an odd argument.
Since their occupation only lasted a certain amount of time, then they didn’t actually occupy?
So if this group would have actually kidnapped the governor and a few weeks later the Feds busted it up and rescued her, then they wouldn’t have successfully kidnapped her?
Allowed. They didn’t successfully do anything.
These guys were acting without permission.
Occupy doesn’t have to be done by force.
Sometimes threat of force is enough.
Of course but they were allowed. Like ows were allowed
I understand, doesn’t change the fact that it was an occupation.
The threat of force, or lack of fortitude by whoever made the decision to allow it doesn’t change what it was, just the means by which it happened, IMO
