BREAKING: Appeals court upholds Boasberg’s deportation block, ignores intent of Alien Enemies Act

[peek-a-boo]

@WuWei

Wonder how long they’ll be in there?

Until the next DEM WH makes arrangements to bring them all back.

[WuWei]

No seriously, no word on the “sentences”?

[YOSUP]

@JayJay

Irrelevant since the only time I ever mention that more people voted for someone other than Donald Trump, it’s to combat the inaccuracy that most Americans voted for him and like what he’s doing.

Neither is true, and that’s the only point I’m making.

Not sure why this is so difficult to grasp.

All the elections proved is the US hates democrats

[bigtwnvin]

@peek-a-boo

Until the next DEM WH makes arrangements to bring them all back.

Actually El Salvador has something to say about that.

[biggestal99]

@bigtwnvin

Actually El Salvador has something to say about that.

lol. us vs el salvador.

its close.

Allan

[peek-a-boo]

@bigtwnvin

Actually El Salvador has something to say about that.

I’m betting the next DEM administration will stop paying for CECOT incarceration.

[bigtwnvin]

Salvadoran nationals wanted for crimes there get to receive their “do do process” and chances are they’re staying in prison. Doesn’t matter what dumbassery the Dims want to invoke, the scum ain’t coming back. The TDA Venezuelans? They belong to Maduro. I’m betting that ■■■■■■ bag uses them for political purposes.

[bigtwnvin]

Oh let’s hope the Dimbulbcrats like Jamie Ratskin campaign on bringing MS-13 and TdA gang bangers back to US streets!

[SixFoot]

Meanwhile, on the left:

[Samson_Corwell]

@johnwk2

@Samson_Corwell

@johnwk2

Unfortunately, Judge Karen Henderson, in her written opinion to shut down some of Trump’s deportations, confused the legislative intent of the Alien Enemies Act.

Judge Henderson went to extraordinary lengths in her written opinion to selectively quote from the Congressional Debates covering the creation of the Alien Enemies Act, and focused on statements in opposition to the Act while ignoring responses given to those statements in opposition, and she also focused on sources other than the actual debates, supposedly to ferret out and arrive at the legislative intent of the Act and evil to be addressed.

Having pointed the above out, on May, 16th, 1798, we find the following in the Congressional Record, House of Representatives, page 1725:

ALIENS.

"Mr. Sewall said, the Committee for the Protection of Commerce and Defence of the Country, to whom it was referred to inquire into what measures would be proper to be taken respecting aliens, were of opinion their instructions did not go to a sufficient extent, and directed him to propose to the House the following resolution for adoption:

“ Resolved, That the committee on that part of the President’s Speech which relates to commerce and the defence of the country, be authorized to consider the danger which may result by means of aliens and other disaffected or seditious persons residing within the United States, and what measures ought to be taken for securing, removing, or otherwise restricting such persons, and to report by bill or otherwise.” ___ LINK

And later, on May, 22nd, Congressional Record, House of Representatives, page 1791, we find:

“Mr. O. believed, therefore, that it would be best to vest a discretionally power in the Executive to secure and take care that these men should do no injury. And this could not be looked upon as a dangerous or exorbitant power, since the President would have the power, the moment war was declared, to apprehend the whole of these people as enemies, and make them prisoners of war. And in case of a predatory incursion, made on this country, there might be as much reason for securing some of them as in case of actual war or invasion.”___ LINK

So, ferreting out and arriving at the legislative intent and evil to be addressed by the Alien Enemies Act, is not as complicate as Judge Henderson presented, which was obviously done by her to complicate and confuse the question.

The bottom line is, the very purpose and legislative intent of the Alien Enemies Act was to provide the President with extraordinary power, including deportation power, to deal with aliens on American soil who may pose a threat to the general welfare of the United States and her citizens.

.

My eyes right now as I read this:

The truth cannot be changed to what it is not.

Those who have actually reviewed the CONGRESSIONAL DEBATES: ALIEN ENEMIES, beginning at page 1785 will certainly find, by a preponderance of evidence, the primary object of An Act Respecting Alien Enemies was to delegate extraordinary powers to the President to deal with aliens on American soil who may threaten the general welfare of the United States and her citizens.

Judge Henderson of the United States Court of Appeals, FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, omitted the overwhelming evidence contradicting what she quoted from the Congressional debates to arrive at her conclusion found in her WRITTEN OPINION e.g., she intentionally ignored various parts of the debates which documents the primary object of the Act such as:

Mr. Otis defends the bill and discretionary power delegated to the president P. 1790-1791

“Mr. O. believed, that, to provide for this detention of the person, was all Congress could now do. If the bill was recommitted, he did not think any definite provision could be made. It was necessary the President should have the power of judging in this case, and that punishment ought not to depend upon the slow operations of a trial.”

The bottom line is, the very purpose and legislative intent of the Alien Enemies Act was to provide the President with extraordinary power, including unobstructed deportation power, to deal with aliens on American soil who may pose a threat to the general welfare of the United States and her citizens.

Judge Henderson is a frickin liar and a disgrace to our judicial system.

JWK

Don’t get too angry, John. You’ll poop yourself if you do.

[DougBH]

@biggestal99

@bigtwnvin

Actually El Salvador has something to say about that.

lol. us vs el salvador.

its close.

Allan

Do you think the judge can order us to invade El Salvador if they refuse to comply with his order? What can he order the President to do to another country?

[DougBH]

Although I see some disincentive to would be illegals by sending illegals to El Salvador, the real game is just to mass deport people who are in this country to their own country and make it more difficult for them to return. This El Salvador thing shouldn’t become a distraction from the real goal.

[dderatz]

@bigtwnvin

Actually El Salvador has something to say about that.

Actually, EL Salvador does not. Please recall that the relationship with El Salvador in this regard is contractual, and they are contracted to hold detainees for us until the US decides what the final disposition will be. In other words, they are acting as a private detention center in the same way that private prisons hold US detainees on US soil. We have not really turned the detainees over the the jurisdiction of El Salvador.

The same argument was made after George II sent detainees to Gitmo. THe Supreme Court slapped that down, just as the will with this.

[WorldWatcher]

@DougBH

Although I see some disincentive to would be illegals by sending illegals to El Salvador, the real game is just to mass deport people who are in this country to their own country and make it more difficult for them to return. This El Salvador thing shouldn’t become a distraction from the real goal.

“…the real game is just to mass deport people who are in this country to their own country…”

Wait! What?

You know we shipped Venezuelans to El Salvador right?

Last I checked El Salvador wasn’t the home country of Venezuelans.

WW

[peek-a-boo]

@WorldWatcher

You know we shipped Venezuelans to El Salvador right?

Last I checked El Salvador wasn’t the home country of Venezuelans.

They agreed to take them. That is the key.

[WorldWatcher]

@peek-a-boo

@WorldWatcher

You know we shipped Venezuelans to El Salvador right?

Last I checked El Salvador wasn’t the home country of Venezuelans.

They agreed to take them. That is the key.

They (El Salvador) didn’t take him as an accepting country under 8 USC 1231.

They took the prisoners as part of a contractual arrangement where the US Taxpayer is housing US prisoners in their facility and the US is paying El Salvador for their services.

So the US Government can stop payments on the $6,000,000 until they/he are returned.

WW

[peek-a-boo]

@WorldWatcher

So the US Government can stop payments on the $6,000,000 until they/he are returned.

That’s not going to happen. No district judge (or any other judge for that matter) can order the administration to stop the $6,000,000 payment in an attempt to force CECOT to return Garcia.

And I seriously doubt the administration will do so.

Either CECOT releases Garcia or they don’t. We will see.

[DougBH]

Why do they all read something I didnt write? Clearly, I said the real goal should be to deport people to their own country. I guess that wasn’t controversial so they have to act like I said something else.

[DougBH]

Maybe the judge can order Trump to invade El Salvador?

[DougBH]

@peek-a-boo

@WorldWatcher

You know we shipped Venezuelans to El Salvador right?

Last I checked El Salvador wasn’t the home country of Venezuelans.

They agreed to take them. That is the key.

He is an El Salvador citizen. We can order El Salvador to hand us one of their citizens?