Well, once again you deflect from the fact that a subversive judge has used their office of public trust to issue a TRO, based on a written opinion which misrepresents legislative intent to arrive at the erroneous conclusion justifying the TRO.
As I previous pointed out to you, adhering to legislative intent certainly does matter.
in Hawaii v. Mankichi, 190 U.S. 197 (1903) our Supreme Court indicated:
“A thing may be within the letter of a statute and not within its meaning, and within its meaning, though not within its letter. The intention of the lawmaker is the law.”
Our Supreme Court has also instructed that:
The whole aim of construction, as applied to a provision of the Constitution, is to discover the meaning, to ascertain and give effect to the intent of its framers and the people who adopted it._____HOME BLDG. & LOAN ASSOCIATION v. BLAISDELL, 290 U.S. 398 (1934)
So, again I ask you, why are you ok with Judge Henderson ignoring the legislative intent of the Alien Enemies Act and obstructing the President’s authority under the Act?
Why are you ok with Judge Henderson nullifying our last federal election and the people’s guaranteed right to vote for change of existing public policy, and judge Henderson nullifying the will of the people by subverting our system‘s rule of law requiring legislative intent to be adhered to?
