They are not talking points. They are objective reality. Is the deficit and debt climbing to new records daily? Yes or no? Are massive amounts of tariffs (taxes) being placed on all kinds of goods that affect American consumers, businesses, and farmers? Yes or no? Is Trump trying to bail out some of these farmers hurt by these tax increases by taking money from one group and giving it to another group? Yes or no?
We all know the answer is yes to all of the above. Ergo, not talking points. Can you be honest enough to admit this? I’m doubtful.
And? He didn’t try to set the FBI and the intelligence communities on it for political purposes. Just spouting a conspiracy theory isn’t so bad if you don’t misuse agencies over it. Freedom of speech.
I love this guy’s bashful, ah shucks I don’t wanna support trump but I hafta! Like we all haven’t also been alive and existing for the past several decades.
Fine…but why defend him so staunchly. If you want to say I voted for the idiot for the ability to select justices. That’s great. But be honest about who he is.
That is completely fair brother. The issue I have is that there are only a small handful of Trump supporters left around here that have not devolved all the way down to the level of following breadcrumbs and waiting with bated breath for the next quatrain. So I take what I can get at times. But point well received.
What’s really at stake is Trump and Company funneling gigantic amounts of money from poor and middle class people up to rich people. I can’t imagine that the wealthiest people in the country would want that to stop.
This is going to be one of those deals when in 20 years they both say that they had to say what they said while they were employed. And then they’ll tell us the truth then.
I am honest about who he is. Since the time of election I have called him out for his ridiculous tweets and his constant lying, often over small matters.
I know many posters apparently don’t remember that part, because I defend againt the ridiculous and unproven allegations (or as Comey called them 'salacious and unverified) that are so often posted on the board from people who pick up this nonsense from much of the media and left wing internet activists.
And I expect proof behind allegations, not just allegations because they make people believe their biases are real.
Kelly calling the book “BS” is a very vague and unspecific denial. So far all of the denials of the book’s contents are very vague and broadbrushed. There is not one specific denial of the book so far.
