Bob Mueller speaking at 11 A.M

[conan]

Mueller report is my evidence.

[SpadeMarlowe]

@PurpnGold

@SpadeMarlowe

Plus, he confirmed again that Trump didn’t commit a crime worth prosecuting.

Mueller Today

We did not, however, make a determination as to whether the President did commit a crime. The introduction to volume two of our report explains that decision.

It explains that under long-standing Department policy, a President cannot be charged with a federal crime while he is in office. That is unconstitutional. Even if the charge is kept under seal and hidden from public view—that too is prohibited.

The Special Counsel’s Office is part of the Department of Justice and, by regulation, it was bound by that Department policy. Charging the President with a crime was therefore not an option we could consider.

Took him 2 years to come up with no specific crime was identified. To me it means Trump IS NOT guilty.
No matter how Mueller twisted into a pretzel to help the Liberals Trump is innocent UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY.
THAT is the bottom line and THAT is how uncorrupted Public will see it.

[sikofit]

@conan

You can’t prove it wasn’t a hit piece, and that’s all I need to know.

Sorry but nobody is buying that who isnt already firmly in Trumps corner

[thinkingman]

@conan

He can’t…it require big words.

lol ouch

but seriously, why hit manafort so hard?

solitary for what, a year?

how about ■■■■■■■ network CNN there and ready for the dramatic arrest of cohen in wee hours…

totally political. right from the start, with stroczk and his side-who… um, mistress.

[conan]

I’m not forcing you to buy it. I just don’t buy the BS that Mueller is selling…or libs for that matter.

[reflechissez]

@conan

You can’t prove it wasn’t a hit piece, and that’s all I need to know.

Keep the hits coming. This logic is impeccable.

[thinkingman]

@SpadeMarlowe

@PurpnGold

@SpadeMarlowe

Plus, he confirmed again that Trump didn’t commit a crime worth prosecuting.

Mueller Today

We did not, however, make a determination as to whether the President did commit a crime. The introduction to volume two of our report explains that decision.

It explains that under long-standing Department policy, a President cannot be charged with a federal crime while he is in office. That is unconstitutional. Even if the charge is kept under seal and hidden from public view—that too is prohibited.

The Special Counsel’s Office is part of the Department of Justice and, by regulation, it was bound by that Department policy. Charging the President with a crime was therefore not an option we could consider.

Took him 2 years to come up with no specific crime was identified. To me it means Trump IS NOT guilty.
No matter how Mueller twisted into a pretzel to help the Liberals Trump is innocent UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY.
THAT is the bottom line and THAT is how uncorrupted Public will see it.

right. as long as they don’t watch msnb psycho c

[lessright]

It’s obvious who hasn’t read the report. I think that’s for plausible deniability.

[enki]

@conan

You can’t prove it wasn’t a hit piece, and that’s all I need to know.

The report itself is proof that it wasn’t a hit piece.

[Cynic]

Is this what we do on Hannity now, mock people for actually supporting their arguments?

[thinkingman]

@reflechissez

@conan

You can’t prove it wasn’t a hit piece, and that’s all I need to know.

Keep the hits coming. This logic is impeccable.

look everyone it’s Reffy!!!

have all the lefties posted already? my goodness

[reflechissez]

@enki

@conan

You can’t prove it wasn’t a hit piece, and that’s all I need to know.

The report itself is proof that it wasn’t a hit piece.

If you just scan the report, the “hit” parts are really noticeable. They kinda jump out atcha. Like an alien on your face. If you read the entire report, the “hit” part is hidden…suppressed…untraceable. Any, that’s what they’re saying.

[thinkingman]

@Cynic

Is this what we do on Hannity now, mock people for actually supporting their arguments?

no they attack personally based on narratives they create out of thin crazy air. just like their idiot media lords do

[SeaManatee]

I could find you a second source if that’s what you want.

[thinkingman]

@reflechissez

@enki

@conan

You can’t prove it wasn’t a hit piece, and that’s all I need to know.

The report itself is proof that it wasn’t a hit piece.

If you just scan the report, the “hit” parts are really noticeable. They kinda jump out atcha. Like an alien on your face. If you read the entire report, the “hit” part is hidden…suppressed…untraceable. Any, that’s what they’re saying.

< slow power clap >

that was …incredible Reffy

it was incomprehensible. but, sentences!

aliens and everything.

so heavy.

[thinkingman]

nothing drives a point home like an “alien on your face”

mind. ba-lown

[reflechissez]

@thinkingman

@reflechissez

@enki

@conan

You can’t prove it wasn’t a hit piece, and that’s all I need to know.

The report itself is proof that it wasn’t a hit piece.

If you just scan the report, the “hit” parts are really noticeable. They kinda jump out atcha. Like an alien on your face. If you read the entire report, the “hit” part is hidden…suppressed…untraceable. Any, that’s what they’re saying.

< slow power clap >

that was …incredible Reffy

it was incomprehensible. but, sentences!

aliens and everything.

so heavy.

It’s really hard to outdo your pithy, logical prose, but a woman’s gotta try. I really want to catch up so I’ll guess I’ll have to start threads that whine about TV shows and freshmen congresswoman. You’ve set the bar so high.

[GWH]

You don’t get sarcasm very well, do you?

[Plasmaball]

Already did. Follow along or should I make it about aoc…?

[Plasmaball]

Lol the only troll job going on here is the right wing media and its supporters…