Well the Fed, which is not biased in a Trump vs non-Trump
sort of way is very definitely biased in another way.
They are very deeply biased in the dual beliefs “We gotta help da poors,”
and “When Congress & the WH spend a bunch of money, we gotta make sure we kick the can down the road so people don’t feel the harm right away.”
They interpret both of those in an expansive, pro-inflation manner.
If 2% inflation were truly their target, they could achieve that in a couple of months.
If they recognize that housing prices are out of equilibrium and causing problems, they could fix that in under a year.
They fail on both counts, not because they are biased in a R vs D sort of way,
but because of their own ideological bias
Okay. Well like I said I wasn’t digging into the actual data myself… And I did say I hoped that I had misheard.
And yes of course there are people out there who are going to try and spin any slightly good news as either fake or negative towards Trump in some way.
I cannot think of anyone from a used car salesman to a Walmart employee who would have any credibility left after being so far off the mark so many times for 7 years in a row.
Hey if it happens it happens, but . . . .
Some really, really smart people think it will be good for the economy if we freeze this in position right where it is.
We should vote them out of office . . . oh wait, we can’t.
In a month we’ll get another. And a month after that, another. And so on. And that’s when we can start to say that this-trend or that-trend is happening, and that today’s number was properly indicating movement in this-direction or that-direction.
All the rest is posturing from one side or the other.
Likewise people looking at the price of gold. (Or at least I was.) But then again, I got my current stash of gold before the turn of the century (and people were telling me it was high then.)
.