Bloomberg: US Economy Shrinks 0.2% (annualized) on Weaker Spending, Larger Trade Impact

Bloomberg is covering this BEA revision in an unusual manner,
(treating it much like it normally treats only first releases, etc.)
giving rise to the possbility that the (obvious) anti-trump anti-tariff bias so many of its TV hosts hold is (perhaps) now leaking into its written news.

That aside, it brings up a topicIenjoy discussing.

image

The US economy shrank at the start of the year, restrained by weaker consumer spending and an even bigger impact from trade than initially reported.

Gross domestic product decreased at a 0.2% annualized pace in the first quarter, the second estimate from the Bureau of Economic Analysis showed Thursday. That compared with an initially reported 0.3% decline. . . .

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-05-29/us-economy-shrinks-0-2-on-weaker-spending-larger-trade-impact

BEA’s actual release notes that this was an UPWARD revision.

The basic story here is that GDP measures “production that is domestic.” Imports are not “production that is domestic” so in the most common way of calculating GDP, imports are subracted from the common starting point.

Interestingly, US business investment SURGED in Q1 2025
Both categories (imports, and business investment) increased 300-400% more than usual.

It occurs to me that since the surge in imports is temporary
and
the surge in business investment will probably have long term impacts,
both are important parts of the story.

like the media i’m curious when it becomes “trump’s economy”

That is just one more example of tariffs not being inflationary.
(In fact the little data we ahve indicates they might be deflatonary.)

Meanwhile they seem to completely miss one of the biggest surges in corporate investment spending in post WW2 history.

1 Like

Probably because the increase in gross private domestic investment was primarily inventory accumulation… from imports.