There is none. This is being done through the justice department and litigation by the ACLU. The Dimbulbcrats and Ole Joey are hedging their bets on the passage of their spending bill that has citizenship provisions for the Uber millions of illegals here now and the ones on their way looking to get paid as well.
Progs?
I wonder if all those, or how many of those if any, who voted for Biden, are now regretting their hatred for Trump.
JWK
There is no better way to weaken, subdue and bring to its knees a prosperous and freedom loving country than by flooding it with the poverty stricken, poorly educated, low skilled, diseased, Covid infected, disabled and criminal populations of other countries. So why is the Biden Administration engaging in this very act?
Not a one. Come on!
Not even liberal anti vaxers who get fired? Oh and wait until the vapers see their new tax hike. Or rich libs with fat Roth IRAâs.
The subtle thing about taxing the ârichâ as a means to fund Cuban style socialism/communism is, first itâs the billionaires who are taxed to help the poor, then the millionaires when no billionaires are left, then those with $500K or more are taxed to help the poor, and eventually itâs you because you have $100 dollars more than your neighbor. And, while all this happens, those who have forced socialism/communism on the country, live large on the taxpayerâs dime!
.
If you donât believe me, ask some of the elderly folk in our country who fled Cuba after Fidel Castro promised to tax the oppressive rich and spread their wealth.
JWK
There is no better way to weaken, subdue and bring to its knees a prosperous and freedom loving country than by flooding it with the poverty stricken, poorly educated, low skilled, diseased, Covid infected, disabled and criminal populations of other countries. So why is the Biden Administration engaging in this very act?
The aame way they can see companies laying off people en masse and point to the inflated stock market and say âsee? Thereâs no recession!â
Or conversely, see companies hiring in droves and say âsee? Weâre in a recession!â
These same people insist that our government (namely Biden) encouraged these people to come here illegally yet insist that same government shouldnât be liable for violating their rights once they come here.
Cognitive dissonance. Itâs a wonderful thing.
An Illegal entrant, when apprehended, does not have a right to not be separated from their child when placed in federal detention. Nor does an American Citizen who breaks our laws, have a right to not be separated from their child when locked up.
Instead of using the Department of Justice to advance the best interests of American citizens and promote the general welfare of the United States and fighting the phony lawsuit cooked up by the ACLU, the Biden Administration is joining with the ACLU and using the Department of Justice to swindle Americaâs taxpayers under the guise of a âsettlementâ.
Let us not forget this lawsuit, as I recall, was started during the Trump Administration with no filings for over a year. And it failed to move forward because the Trump Administration told the ACLU con artists to screw off. But as soon as the Biden Administration took over, it colluded with the ACLU in determining how to settle without a lawsuit and for how much they could fleece the American taxpayer for.
If anyone should be punished, or sued, it should be the parents of the children dragged into this illegal entrant money laundering rope-a-dope operation, along with their ACLU attorneys .
JWK
1 Like
He did.
What right was violated?
2 Likes
I see your question has yet to be answered. Apparently that is why the Biden Administration wants to âsettleâ out of court, instead of having to explain to a jury what right has been violated when a lawbreaker is criminally detained and separated from their child.
This is why I firmly believe the Biden Administration is colluding with ACLU lawyers in a $BILLION fleecing scheme of our taxpayer filled federal treasury.
JWK
Is there any kind of discussion about giving people who are coming here the right way money?
https://twitter.com/RickyLe80284150/status/1457526804994949122
Jeesh donât give them ideas
Questions I would like to hear answered.
What is the ACLUâs take from this fraud. Sounds like their lawyers (I hate lawyers) have cooked up a fine little get quick rich scheme here.
My sense is that the trump administration was following the law? I remember them asking congress to make changes in the law that they had passed at that timeâŚwhat legal precedent would be set by giving money to people who broke laws that our government was enforcing?
When the president of the United States said last weds that this was a âgarbageâ storyâŚfollowed by a quick rebuke by the acluâŚfollowed by a Thursday story change from the White House press person in one of the most confusing answers youâll ever hear. Then on Friday Biden pointed and yelled and lied about the question he was answeringâŚ
Does he have any clue whatâs going on?
Or, Im just tired of repeating myself.
"Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution states, âThe privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.â
Amazing how the Constitutional experts in this thread keep missing whatâs literally in the Constitution.
And how does that apply?
And you wonder why I donât take you seriously.
And what does that have to do with the topic of the thread? What exactly are you implying?
JWK
Itâs certainly more relevant than âreparations.â Maybe Iâm implying you should actually read the Constitution. 
Your snarky remark is noted. Once again, let me ask, what does Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution have to do with the subject of the thread? What exactly are you implying by posting it?
JWK
Asked and answered john. Itâs ok. i know perfectly well why youâre ignoring it.
Like I said, Iâm tired of repeating myself.
