Biden Public Rival Threat Pattern. Presidential?

[conan]

Soloman needs more hearsay to be valid.

[Guilds]

@conan

Because it wasn’t lib approved source/information?

Because it is false, inaccurate data, wrapped in conspiracy theories…

He presents it well, by labeling innuendos, as “facts”.

It works well on many.

[sikofit]

@JayJay

@Smyrna

@sikofit

That is the same John Soloman talking points that habe no basis in reality. You’ll have to do better than the person who got his info directly from indicted Oligarchs

Yeah…I know. Even though every fact…provides the source? I can’t imagine why I thought you might be able to digest reality? Now…run along l’il one.

Every source…is either unverified or…upon close examination…the source does not support the conclusion Mr. Solomon leads his loyal readers to believing it does.

Beat me to it. He obviously didnt check up on the source material

[conan]

See post above.

[biggestal99]

@WuWei

He ADMITTED it.

He had substance abuse problems all his life.

Crack is the least of them.

One who takes crack is not a necessary a crackhead.

Allan

[biggestal99]

@biggestal99

He had substance abuse problems all his life.

Crack is the least of them.

One who takes crack is not a necessary a crackhead.

Allan

I think alcohol is his substance of choice.

Allan

[WuWei]

@biggestal99

One who takes crack is not a necessary a crackhead.

[Guilds]

@Smyrna

Yeah…I know. Even though every fact…provides the source? I can’t imagine why I thought you might be able to digest reality? Now…run along l’il one

Providing a link to a source, that he then uses innuendo, and a lot of imagination, does not make it true.

Why did the House R’s not get him to testify?

[Camp]

@Guilds

He presents it well, by labeling innuendos, as “facts”.

Where have we seen this in the last couple weeks?

Is it a numbers game?

Most witnesses win!

There will be a trial in the Senate and we can punch at a solid conclusion through all the suggestive testimony.

[Guilds]

@JayJay

Mr. Solomon relies on what many CEC folks rely on…he writes conclusions he knows his target audience will agree with, and knows they will not dig any deeper and just assume the “memos” and “documents” he’s supplied actually support the conclusion he’s stated.

Exactly.

Digging is hard.

[PurpnGold]

@Camp

Slow down there tiger.

We are in the exploratory phase thanks to the impeachment inquiry.

Finding out if there was merit to single out Biden AS VP is paramount to the issue.

Graham started looking and Biden threatened him on CNN.

Not a good look for Joe.

Punching at it can make him look like a tough leader or someone with something to hide.

This makes zero sense. Republicans wanted Hunter Biden to testify. They put him on their witness list.

John Solomon allegedly has evidence that will prove Trump was right in wanting to investigate Hunter. If he has this evidence, why wasn’t he on the republicans witness list? Why isn’t any of his evidence entered into this inquiry?

Why wasn’t Guliani? He was the one who did the investigation.

[Camp]

Schiff did not allow any R witnesses.

You know this.

Like punching at air.

[Guilds]

@conan

See post above

Which one…there are 200 + posts above this one.

[H_Arendt]

Since three witnesses who appeared bore[quote=“Camp, post:235, topic:222779, full:true”]
Schiff did not allow any R witnesses.

You know this.

Like punching at air.

[/quote]

Since three witnesses who were called were requested by the Republicans were called and did testify before the committee, why are you making an easily disproved claim?

[WuWei]

@Guilds

Exactly.

Digging is hard.

@sikofit

Beat me to it. He obviously didnt check up on the source material

@Guilds

He presents it well, by labeling innuendos, as “facts”.

It works well on many.

@JayJay

he writes conclusions he knows his target audience will agree with, and knows they will not dig any deeper and just assume the “memos” and “documents” he’s supplied actually support the conclusion he’s stated.

Believe first…

These posts are simply amazing. The level of libbish cognitive dissonance on display is truly impressive.

[Guilds]

@Camp

Schiff did not allow any R witnesses

Sure he did.

There were a few turned down.

Why was Rudy, or Solomon not on that list?

[sikofit]

@Camp

Schiff did not allow any R witnesses.

You know this.

Somebody is not paying attention. That is not true

[Guilds]

@WuWei

These posts are simply amazing. The level of libbish cognitive dissonance on display is truly impressive.

Au contraire…

We simply refuted nonsense.

Did you read Solomon’s article, and look at the sources?

[NuffSaid]

@sikofit

@Camp

Schiff did not allow any R witnesses.

You know this.

Somebody is not paying attention. That is not true

Remember that the soviet style secret meetings had zero Republicans in it.

[conan]

■■■■ for brains made it perfectly clear this hearing wasn’t about Biden.

The senate just might be total different animal. And thus why libs are back peddling big time.